mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Trust your neighbours: Penalty-based constraints for model calibration

arXiv 2303.06268 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2023cs.CVcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring reliable confidence scores from deep networks is of pivotal importance in critical decision-making systems, notably in the medical domain. While recent literature on calibrating deep segmentation networks has led to significant progress, their uncertainty is usually modeled by leveraging the information of individual pixels, which disregards the local structure of the object of interest. In particular, only the recent Spatially Varying Label Smoothing (SVLS) approach addresses this issue by softening the pixel label assignments with a discrete spatial Gaussian kernel. In this work, we first present a constrained optimization perspective of SVLS and demonstrate that it enforces an implicit constraint on soft class proportions of surrounding pixels. Furthermore, our analysis shows that SVLS lacks a mechanism to balance the contribution of the constraint with the primary objective, potentially hindering the optimization process. Based on these observations, we propose a principled and simple solution based on equality constraints on the logit values, which enables to control explicitly both the enforced constraint and the weight of the penalty, offering more flexibility. Comprehensive experiments on a variety of well-known segmentation benchmarks demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed approach.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2023.

Builds on

16 of 25 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  3. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  4. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  5. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  6. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
  7. 2018Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challengecited by 508
  8. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
  9. 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 359
  10. 2020Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Losscited by 353
  11. 2020AbdomenCT-1K: Is Abdominal Organ Segmentation A Solved Problem?cited by 222
  12. 2020Mix-n-Match: Ensemble and Compositional Methods for Uncertainty Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 190
4 more
  1. 2020Local Temperature Scaling for Probability Calibrationcited by 95
  2. 2021The Devil is in the Margin: Margin-based Label Smoothing for Network Calibrationcited by 91
  3. 2020Post-hoc Uncertainty Calibration for Domain Drift Scenarioscited by 61
  4. 2021Spatially Varying Label Smoothing: Capturing Uncertainty from Expert Annotationscited by 31

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 6; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

12 papers.