mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ACLS: Adaptive and Conditional Label Smoothing for Network Calibration

arXiv 2308.11911 ↗First posted 23 Aug 2023cs.CVcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We address the problem of network calibration adjusting miscalibrated confidences of deep neural networks. Many approaches to network calibration adopt a regularization-based method that exploits a regularization term to smooth the miscalibrated confidences. Although these approaches have shown the effectiveness on calibrating the networks, there is still a lack of understanding on the underlying principles of regularization in terms of network calibration. We present in this paper an in-depth analysis of existing regularization-based methods, providing a better understanding on how they affect to network calibration. Specifically, we have observed that 1) the regularization-based methods can be interpreted as variants of label smoothing, and 2) they do not always behave desirably. Based on the analysis, we introduce a novel loss function, dubbed ACLS, that unifies the merits of existing regularization methods, while avoiding the limitations. We show extensive experimental results for image classification and semantic segmentation on standard benchmarks, including CIFAR10, Tiny-ImageNet, ImageNet, and PASCAL VOC, demonstrating the effectiveness of our loss function.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2023.

Builds on

26 of 39 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  3. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  5. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  6. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,161
  7. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
  8. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 464
  9. 2019Measuring Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 446
  10. 2019A Survey of Deep Learning Techniques for Autonomous Drivingcited by 403
  11. 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 390
  12. 2020Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Losscited by 357
14 more
  1. 2014Learning Fine-grained Image Similarity with Deep Rankingcited by 190
  2. 2020Mix-n-Match: Ensemble and Compositional Methods for Uncertainty Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 190
  3. 2019Addressing Failure Prediction by Learning Model Confidencecited by 186
  4. 2019Confidence Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Medical Image Segmentationcited by 163
  5. 2020Confidence-Aware Learning for Deep Neural Networkscited by 113
  6. 2020Local Temperature Scaling for Probability Calibrationcited by 95
  7. 2021The Devil is in the Margin: Margin-based Label Smoothing for Network Calibrationcited by 91
  8. 2019Misbehaviour Prediction for Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 55
  9. 2022A Stitch in Time Saves Nine: A Train-Time Regularizing Loss for Improved Neural Network Calibrationcited by 49
  10. 2021Parameterized Temperature Scaling for Boosting the Expressive Power in Post-Hoc Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 48
  11. 2021Meta-Cal: Well-controlled Post-hoc Calibration by Rankingcited by 33
  12. 2022AdaFocal: Calibration-aware Adaptive Focal Losscited by 32
  13. 2022Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Explicit Regularisation and Dynamic Data Pruningcited by 18
  14. 2021Deep Probability Estimationcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 7; 2026: 2.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: