mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LOGOS: LiDAR-Only Gaussian Elevation Splatting for Unified Tiny Obstacle Segmentation

arXiv 2606.21527 ↗First posted 19 Jun 2026cs.RO cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Robust obstacle segmentation is essential for the safety of intelligent robots, where LiDAR-based perception systems play a fundamental role in the robot-environment interaction. While extensive LiDAR-based approaches have demonstrated high performance on common obstacles in urban scenarios, their results on tiny obstacles such as curbs, gravel, and potholes remain unsatisfactory due to the significant similarity between tiny obstacles and inherent road undulations. Moreover, their segmentation accuracy even deteriorates sharply when the LiDAR scans suffer from degradation in challenging off-road scenes. To overcome these bottlenecks, we propose LOGOS, a LiDAR-only unified tiny obstacle segmentation system, which models the road surface as a continuous mixture of 2D Gaussian primitives and distinguishes tiny obstacles via high-presicion elevation estimation. Unlike existing Gaussian splatting methods that rely on iterative RGB training, LOGOS is a backpropagation-free LiDAR-only approach. It directly estimates Gaussian parameters via a freespace-aware initialization by incrementally pruning non-road primitives using smoothness constraints. Subsequently, pointwise signed distances are computed via a novel normal-aware elevation splatting function, ensuring robustness to both flat and sloped terrains. We evaluate LOGOS on a highly heterogeneous benchmark of point cloud frames collected from urban mobility scenarios and mining haulage off-road environments. These data are practically acquired using different LiDAR sensors and exhibit large variations in point density, terrain roughness, and obstacle types. Experiments on the road and off-road scenes demonstrate that LOGOS significantly outperforms other state-of-the-art methods, particularly in degraded point cloud regions and challenging off-road scenarios, while maintaining real-time efficiency.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2026.

Builds on

17 of 36 references.

References · 17

  1. 20233D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Renderingcited by 6,226
  2. 2022Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encodingcited by 3,723
  3. 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,689
  4. 20242D Gaussian Splatting for Geometrically Accurate Radiance Fieldscited by 1,076
  5. 2022NeuS2: Fast Learning of Neural Implicit Surfaces for Multi-view Reconstructioncited by 314
  6. 2017SqueezeSeg: Convolutional Neural Nets with Recurrent CRF for Real-Time Road-Object Segmentation from 3D LiDAR Point Cloudcited by 232
  7. 20222DPASS: 2D Priors Assisted Semantic Segmentation on LiDAR Point Cloudscited by 158
  8. 2023Spherical Transformer for LiDAR-based 3D Recognitioncited by 125
  9. 2022Point-to-Voxel Knowledge Distillation for LiDAR Semantic Segmentationcited by 119
  10. 2022Patchwork++: Fast and Robust Ground Segmentation Solving Partial Under-Segmentation Using 3D Point Cloudcited by 47
  11. 2020Semantic Graph Based Place Recognition for 3D Point Cloudscited by 43
  12. 2019Pothole Detection Based on Disparity Transformation and Road Surface Modelingcited by 38
5 more
  1. 2021Patchwork: Concentric Zone-based Region-wise Ground Segmentation with Ground Likelihood Estimation Using a 3D LiDAR Sensorcited by 29
  2. 2022Computer Vision for Road Imaging and Pothole Detection: A State-of-the-Art Review of Systems and Algorithmscited by 19
  3. 2020LiDAR guided Small obstacle Segmentationcited by 17
  4. 2023TFNet: Exploiting Temporal Cues for Fast and Accurate LiDAR Semantic Segmentationcited by 13
  5. 2024TASeg: Temporal Aggregation Network for LiDAR Semantic Segmentationcited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.