Sequential Kernel-based Conditional Independence Testing via Adaptive Betting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Testing conditional independence is fundamental yet intrinsically difficult: without additional assumptions, Type I error control is impossible in general. The "Model-X'' paradigm addresses this difficulty by assuming exact knowledge of a relevant conditional distribution. While small deviations from this assumption can sometimes be tolerated in classical one-shot testing, existing sequential conditional independence tests typically require the Model-X conditional to be known exactly, making them fragile when it must instead be estimated. We propose a new approach that is substantially more robust to such estimation error. Our method applies testing-by-betting to an adaptively optimized Kernel Conditional Independence statistic, together with a normalization scheme and a truncate-and-shift calibration strategy. These modifications greatly reduce Type I error inflation while preserving high power across high-dimensional synthetic benchmarks and real-world fairness tasks, outperforming existing sequential Model-X approaches. Code is available at https://github.com/he-zh/SKCI.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.
Builds on
16 of 32 references.
References · 16
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2016Panning for Gold: Model-X Knockoffs for High-dimensional Controlled Variable Selectioncited by 120
- 2024Hypothesis testing with e-valuescited by 70
- 2022Optimal Rates for Regularized Conditional Mean Embedding Learningcited by 50
- 2022Invariant and Transportable Representations for Anti-Causal Domain Shiftscited by 37
- 2021Nonparametric Two-Sample Testing by Bettingcited by 36
- 2022Sequential Kernelized Independence Testingcited by 15
- 2020Dimension-agnostic inference using cross U-statisticscited by 14
- 2022Model-X Sequential Testing for Conditional Independence via Testing by Bettingcited by 14
- 2022Anytime Valid Tests of Conditional Independence Under Model-Xcited by 11
- 2022E-Valuating Classifier Two-Sample Testscited by 10
- 2023Conditional independence testing under misspecified inductive biasescited by 7
4 more
- 2023Deep anytime-valid hypothesis testingcited by 7
- 2025On the Hardness of Conditional Independence Testing In Practicecited by 6
- 2025Testing Conditional Mean Independence Using Generative Neural Networkscited by 3
- 2023Distribution-uniform anytime-valid sequential inference and the Robbins-Siegmund distributionscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.