mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dimension-agnostic inference using cross U-statistics

arXiv 2011.05068 ↗First posted 10 Nov 2020math.ST stat.ME stat.MLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Classical asymptotic theory for statistical inference usually involves calibrating a statistic by fixing the dimension d while letting the sample size n increase to infinity. Recently, much effort has been dedicated towards understanding how these methods behave in high-dimensional settings, where d and n both increase to infinity together. This often leads to different inference procedures, depending on the assumptions about the dimensionality, leaving the practitioner in a bind: given a dataset with 100 samples in 20 dimensions, should they calibrate by assuming n gg d, or d/n ≈ 0.2? This paper considers the goal of dimension-agnostic inference; developing methods whose validity does not depend on any assumption on d versus n. We introduce an approach that uses variational representations of existing test statistics along with sample splitting and self-normalization to produce a refined test statistic with a Gaussian limiting distribution, regardless of how d scales with n. The resulting statistic can be viewed as a careful modification of degenerate U-statistics, dropping diagonal blocks and retaining off-diagonal blocks. We exemplify our technique for some classical problems including one-sample mean and covariance testing, and show that our tests have minimax rate-optimal power against appropriate local alternatives. In most settings, our cross U-statistic matches the high-dimensional power of the corresponding (degenerate) U-statistic up to a √2 factor.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 6; 2026: 3.

14 papers.

Sort: