mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Be Your Own Teacher: Steering Protein Language Models via Unsupervised Reward Optimization

arXiv 2606.18961 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Preference optimization for molecular design

Abstract (arXiv)

Protein language models (PLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for controllable biomolecular design, yet their post-training adaptation typically relies on costly wet-lab validation or curated preference datasets. To overcome this supervision bottleneck, we introduce unsupervised reward optimization of PLMs, a comprehensive framework for steerable protein generation without ground-truth labels. Our key insight is that task-agnostic rewards, which combine intrinsic model uncertainty with extrinsic semantic consistency informed by protein representation models, exhibit strong correlation with controllability measures across base models and temperature regimes. Building upon this discovery, we propose two offline algorithms: Soft Reward Optimization (SRO) and Binarized Reward Optimization (BRO), which effectively maximize the classical RLHF objective induced by these proxy rewards. Extensive experiments on compositional out-of-distribution prompts demonstrate that both methods significantly outperform competitive baselines (DPO, KTO), while approaching oracle performance across multiple sampling temperatures, model scales and protein families. Moreover, PLMs fine-tuned with unsupervised rewards can achieve consistently higher coverage compared to their base model in pass@k evaluations. By enabling self-improvement of PLMs through their own generated experience, our framework provides a scalable pathway toward controllable biomolecular design in settings where labeled preferences or experimental feedback are scarce or unavailable.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Preference optimization for molecular design, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 44 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.

Builds on

44 of 88 references.

References · 44

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  4. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  5. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  6. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  7. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  8. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  9. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  10. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  11. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  12. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
32 more
  1. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  2. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  3. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  4. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 982
  5. 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 819
  6. 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 669
  7. 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 503
  8. 2025The Entropy Mechanism of Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Modelscited by 485
  9. 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 467
  10. 2025Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero Datacited by 344
  11. 2025TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learningcited by 275
  12. 2023Pretraining Language Models with Human Preferencescited by 247
  13. 2025Learning to Reason without External Rewardscited by 210
  14. 2024ReFT: Representation Finetuning for Language Modelscited by 197
  15. 2021A Survey of Zero-shot Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 170
  16. 2025The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Entropy Minimization in LLM Reasoningcited by 166
  17. 2022ProGen2: Exploring the Boundaries of Protein Language Modelscited by 159
  18. 2025Right Question is Already Half the Answer: Fully Unsupervised LLM Reasoning Incentivizationcited by 128
  19. 2025DeepSeekMath-V2: Towards Self-Verifiable Mathematical Reasoningcited by 94
  20. 2024ProLLaMA: A Protein Large Language Model for Multi-Task Protein Language Processingcited by 53
  21. 2025Evaluating Large Language Models in Scientific Discoverycited by 42
  22. 2025Reinforcement Pre-Trainingcited by 40
  23. 2023Hot or Cold? Adaptive Temperature Sampling for Code Generation with Large Language Modelscited by 38
  24. 2025No Free Lunch: Rethinking Internal Feedback for LLM Reasoningcited by 37
  25. 2025Nemotron-CrossThink: Scaling Self-Learning beyond Math Reasoningcited by 31
  26. 2026How Far Can Unsupervised RLVR Scale LLM Training?cited by 30
  27. 2025LADDER: Self-Improving LLMs Through Recursive Problem Decompositioncited by 25
  28. 2025RLP: Reinforcement as a Pretraining Objectivecited by 25
  29. 2025DuPO: Enabling Reliable LLM Self-Verification via Dual Preference Optimizationcited by 7
  30. 2025Steering Protein Language Modelscited by 7
  31. 2023Generative artificial intelligence for de novo protein designcited by 5
  32. 2026SaDiT: Efficient Protein Backbone Design via Latent Structural Tokenization and Diffusion Transformerscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025From Supervision to Exploration: What Does Protein Language Model Learn During Reinforcement Learning?
  2. 2024Reinforcement Learning for Sequence Design Leveraging Protein Language Models
  3. 2025Self Distillation Fine-Tuning of Protein Language Models Improves Versatility in Protein Design
  4. 2025Steering Generative Models with Experimental Data for Protein Fitness Optimization
  5. 2026Two-Stage Fine-Tuning for Protein Sequence Generation with Targeted Amino-Acid Composition
  6. 2026Controlling Repetition in Protein Language Models
  7. 2026AgentPLM: Agentic Protein Language Models with Reasoning-Augmented Decoding for Protein Sequence Design
  8. 2026Protein Language Models Diverge from Natural Language: Comparative Analysis and Improved Inference