mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dual-Channel Grounded World Modeling (DCGWM): Structural Prevention of Objective Interference Collapse via Heterogeneous External Grounding with Inward-Only Gradient Flow

arXiv 2606.18688 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: World models → Latent predictive world models

Abstract (arXiv)

Joint Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) are a leading approach to world model representation learning. We identify a failure mode in JEPA-based world models grounded against two qualitatively distinct external signals: physical dynamics (sparse, high-magnitude, constraint-satisfying gradient corrections) and social-behavioral dynamics (diffuse, distribution-matching corrections). We term this Objective Interference Collapse (OIC): we argue that joint learning in a shared latent space causes the dominant channel to systematically collapse the subordinate channel's representational subspace, in a manner not resolvable by loss weighting alone. We propose Dual-Channel Grounded World Modeling (DCGWM), designed to structurally prevent OIC through a partitioned latent space (physical subspace Z_p, behavioral subspace Z_b) with inward-only gradient flow. A Physical Grounding Channel updates only Z_p via VICReg-style alignment to physical measurements; a Social-Behavioral Grounding Channel updates only Z_b via alignment to trajectories from an emergent multi-agent simulation. An Inter-Channel Interface Module couples the subspaces at the task level without cross-subspace gradients. An Asymmetric Grounding Adherence Loss penalizes rollout drift with a hard hinge for physical violations and a soft KL for behavioral divergence. A Generative Rendering Layer is architecturally isolated from the latent world model. We present three theoretical results: the partition removes the gradient-interference pathway implicated in OIC; each grounded subspace inherits anti-collapse guarantees from its alignment objective; and generative isolation is necessary under a stated assumption on the generative objective's geometry. This manuscript establishes the problem formulation and architecture; experimental validation is ongoing and will be reported in a future revision.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Latent predictive world models, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 1 of its 2 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.

Builds on

1 of 2 references.

References · 1

  1. 2022Limitations of Neural Collapse for Understanding Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 63

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Orthogonal JEPA: Factorized Predictive States for Latent World Models
  2. 2026No Gaussian Required: Contrastive Inverse Dynamics for JEPA World Models
  3. 2026UWM-JEPA: Predictive World Models That Imagine in Belief Space
  4. 2026PhyLatent: Learning Dynamics-Relevant Representations for JEPA World Models
  5. 2026Spectral-Target Physical Latent Structuring for JEPA-Style World Models
  6. 2026Subspace-Decomposed JEPAs: Disentangling Progression and Content in Latent World Models
  7. 2026Platonic Representation Hypothesis on World Models
  8. 2026Counterfactual Action Evaluation, Observation Bottlenecks, and Representation Geometry in Joint-Embedding Predictive World Models