mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Geometry-Aware Post-Hoc Uncertainty Quantification in Operator Learning

arXiv 2606.17513 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural operators provide fast surrogates for PDEs but their deterministic predictions limit their use in tasks requiring uncertainty quantification (UQ), especially under geometric variability. Existing approaches primarily model uncertainty in network parameters, largely overlooking the geometry-aware representations learned by the operator itself. We propose REEF-GP (Residual on Embedded Features Gaussian Process), a post-hoc UQ framework that fits a GP to the residuals of a frozen neural operator whose internal embeddings define the kernel feature space. Rather than learning a separate feature map, REEF-GP adapts the operator's intrinsic coordinate-feature representations to construct geometry-aware uncertainties. To ensure stability and scalability on unstructured domains, REEF-GP incorporates spectral-normalized projections, heteroscedastic geometry-aware noise, and efficient subset-based training that avoids restrictive low-rank approximations. Across five PDE benchmarks with varying geometries, REEF-GP preserves predictive accuracy while achieving calibrated uncertainty estimates competitive with deep ensembles but at a fraction of their cost. Our approach remains robust under geometric distribution shift, with uncertainty concentrating in physically meaningful regions (e.g., shock fronts). Our results demonstrate that accurate and scalable post-hoc UQ for neural operators can be achieved directly in their learned feature space, offering a practical alternative to parameter-centric approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2026.

Builds on

38 of 57 references.

References · 38

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  4. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  5. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  6. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  7. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
  8. 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 555
  9. 2015Deep Kernel Learningcited by 440
  10. 2022Fourier Neural Operator with Learned Deformations for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 416
  11. 2021Laplace Redux -- Effortless Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 359
  12. 2024Transolver: A Fast Transformer Solver for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 299
26 more
  1. 2023Geometry-Informed Neural Operator for Large-Scale 3D PDEscited by 293
  2. 2025Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Modelscited by 293
  3. 2014Scalable Variational Gaussian Process Classificationcited by 226
  4. 2023Spherical Fourier Neural Operators: Learning Stable Dynamics on the Spherecited by 225
  5. 2015Kernel Interpolation for Scalable Structured Gaussian Processes (KISS-GP)cited by 175
  6. 2022Uncertainty Quantification in Scientific Machine Learning: Methods, Metrics, and Comparisonscited by 169
  7. 2025Transolver++: An Accurate Neural Solver for PDEs on Million-Scale Geometriescited by 89
  8. 2014Generalized Product of Experts for Automatic and Principled Fusion of Gaussian Process Predictionscited by 66
  9. 2024Pretraining Codomain Attention Neural Operators for Solving Multiphysics PDEscited by 58
  10. 2023Kernel Methods are Competitive for Operator Learningcited by 50
  11. 2018Kernel Flows: from learning kernels from data into the abysscited by 49
  12. 2022A Simple Approach to Improve Single-Model Deep Uncertainty via Distance-Awarenesscited by 49
  13. 2022Approximate Bayesian Neural Operators: Uncertainty Quantification for Parametric PDEscited by 24
  14. 2024Active Learning for Neural PDE Solverscited by 22
  15. 2023Error Analysis of Kernel/GP Methods for Nonlinear and Parametric PDEscited by 21
  16. 2024Operator Learning with Gaussian Processescited by 18
  17. 2023GP+: A Python Library for Kernel-based learning via Gaussian Processescited by 17
  18. 2025Probabilistic neural operators for functional uncertainty quantificationcited by 17
  19. 2024Using Uncertainty Quantification to Characterize and Improve Out-of-Domain Learning for PDEscited by 14
  20. 2024Linearization Turns Neural Operators into Function-Valued Gaussian Processescited by 11
  21. 2024Kernel Neural Operators (KNOs) for Scalable, Memory-efficient, Geometrically-flexible Operator Learningcited by 10
  22. 2022Bayesian Calibration of Imperfect Computer Models using Physics-Informed Priorscited by 9
  23. 2025Light-Weight Diffusion Multiplier and Uncertainty Quantification for Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 6
  24. 2024A physics-encoded Fourier neural operator approach for surrogate modeling of divergence-free stress fields in solidscited by 4
  25. 2023Vecchia Gaussian Process Ensembles on Internal Representations of Deep Neural Networkscited by 3
  26. 2025A Neural Operator based Hybrid Microscale Model for Multiscale Simulation of Rate-Dependent Materialscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.