Optimal Transport Dropout for Structured Predictive Uncertainty
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deterministic neural networks and neural operators provide point predictions with no intrinsic measure of reliability. Yet, predictive uncertainty may stem from irreducible outcome variability, finite data, or limitations of the chosen model class. Monte Carlo dropout offers a computationally convenient way to construct a predictive distribution through stochastic feature masking, without training multiple independent networks or explicitly inferring a posterior over model parameters. However, its perturbation law is largely prescribed a priori and typically factorised across latent coordinates. We introduce Optimal Transport Dropout (OTD), which instead learns the predictive mapping and the law of its latent perturbations jointly. Starting from a simple independent reference distribution, OTD transports latent perturbations through a learnable flow and propagates them through the predictive neural network, thereby inducing a structured predictive law. Training uses the strictly proper Energy Score, while a kinetic-action term geometrically regularises the transport. Synthetic benchmarks show that OTD captures multimodal predictive distributions, generates meaningful dispersion when the model is misspecified, and exhibits contracting dispersion as more training data or greater model capacity are provided. For a field-valued partial differential equation surrogate, predictive dispersion strongly aligns with the spatial pattern of prediction errors. On this task, compared with Monte Carlo dropout, OTD yields more accurate predictions and better-calibrated, substantially narrower intervals. On real-world regression benchmarks, it further shows competitive accuracy and better probabilistic predictions compared to established baselines. OTD therefore offers a way to learn structured predictive uncertainty without explicit posterior inference or ensembles of independently trained predictors.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2026.
Builds on
25 of 36 references.
References · 25
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
- 2016Improving Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive Flowcited by 640
- 2017Concrete Dropoutcited by 227
- 2017Multiplicative Normalizing Flows for Variational Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 157
- 2021Epistemic Neural Networkscited by 120
- 2016Structured and Efficient Variational Deep Learning with Matrix Gaussian Posteriorscited by 82
- 2023A Survey on Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Deep Learningcited by 81
- 2019Latent Normalizing Flows for Discrete Sequencescited by 67
- 2024Rethinking Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertaintycited by 42
- 2021Probabilistic Forecasting with Generative Networks via Scoring Rule Minimizationcited by 37
13 more
- 2022GFlowOut: Dropout with Generative Flow Networkscited by 22
- 2025Combining physics-based and data-driven models: advancing the frontiers of research with Scientific Machine Learningcited by 10
- 2025Position: Epistemic uncertainty estimation methods are fundamentally incompletecited by 9
- 2026Error Analysis of Neural-Network-Based Engressioncited by 4
- 2026Quantifying Epistemic Uncertainty in Diffusion Modelscited by 2
- 2026Structure-Aware Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification for Neural Operator PDE Surrogatescited by 2
- 2025GenUQ: Predictive Uncertainty Estimates via Generative Hyper-Networkscited by 1
- 2025Multidimensional Uncertainty Quantification via Optimal Transportcited by 1
- 2025Nonparametric estimation of conditional probability distributions using a generative approach based on conditional push-forward neural networkscited by 1
- 2026Uncertainty-Aware Distribution-to-Distribution Flow Matching for Scientific Imagingcited by 1
- 2026Geometry-Aware Post-Hoc Uncertainty Quantification in Operator Learningcited by 1
- 2026On the sensitivity of machine-learned probabilistic weather forecast models to scale-aware scoring rulescited by 1
- 2026A Ground-Truth Framework for Uncertainty Disentanglement with Posterior Riskcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.