mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bayesian Calibration of Imperfect Computer Models using Physics-Informed Priors

arXiv 2201.06463 ↗First posted 17 Jan 2022stat.ML cs.LG stat.MEcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a computational efficient data-driven framework suitable for quantifying the uncertainty in physical parameters and model formulation of computer models, represented by differential equations. We construct physics-informed priors, which are multi-output GP priors that encode the model's structure in the covariance function. This is extended into a fully Bayesian framework that quantifies the uncertainty of physical parameters and model predictions. Since physical models often are imperfect descriptions of the real process, we allow the model to deviate from the observed data by considering a discrepancy function. For inference, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo is used. Further, approximations for big data are developed that reduce the computational complexity from O(N3) to O(N· m2), where m ll N. Our approach is demonstrated in simulation and real data case studies where the physics are described by time-dependent ODEs describe (cardiovascular models) and space-time dependent PDEs (heat equation). In the studies, it is shown that our modelling framework can recover the true parameters of the physical models in cases where 1) the reality is more complex than our modelling choice and 2) the data acquisition process is biased while also producing accurate predictions. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that our approach is computationally faster than traditional Bayesian calibration methods.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2022.

Builds on

11 of 51 references.

References · 11

  1. 2017Machine Learning of Linear Differential Equations using Gaussian Processescited by 139
  2. 2017Numerical Gaussian Processes for Time-dependent and Non-linear Partial Differential Equationscited by 72
  3. 2016Understanding Probabilistic Sparse Gaussian Process Approximationscited by 68
  4. 2013Local Gaussian process approximation for large computer experimentscited by 59
  5. 2015MCMC for Variationally Sparse Gaussian Processescited by 44
  6. 2016Random Feature Expansions for Deep Gaussian Processescited by 32
  7. 2020APIK: Active Physics-Informed Kriging Model with Partial Differential Equationscited by 9
  8. 2014Calibrating a large computer experiment simulating radiative shock hydrodynamicscited by 4
  9. 2018Uncertainty quantification for computer models with spatial output using calibration-optimal basescited by 4
  10. 2016Computer model calibration with large non-stationary spatial outputs: application to the calibration of a climate modelcited by 2
  11. 2013A composite likelihood approach to computer model calibration using high-dimensional spatial datacited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

9 papers.