mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Online Convex Optimization with Sublinear Noisy Probes

arXiv 2606.14640 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.DScited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study Online Convex Optimization (OCO) over a convex set Ksubseteq mathbb Rd, where in each round t the learner selects xt∈ K and then observes a convex loss ft:K→[0,1], with the goal of minimizing regret to the best fixed decision in hindsight. We introduce a unified probing model that generalizes two recent lines of work: sublinear best-expert queries in the experts setting, and pairwise (comparison-based) feedback available every round in OCO. In our framework, the learner has a budget of k≤ T pairwise probes; on a probed round it may query two points and learn which one has smaller loss. Our main result shows that even a sublinear and noisy probe budget can provably improve worst-case regret in the full feedback OCO regime. With k δ-noisy pairwise probes, we obtain: RegT ≤ Oleft(minleft√dTln T,; fracdTln Tk|1-2δ|rightright) , which is tight (up to logarithmic factors in T) across T, k and δ. Specifically regarding the noise parameter δ ∈ [0,1], the regret guarantee smoothly degrades as the oracle response approaches a coin flip, i.e., δ is close to frac12. When applying the same techniques to a finite K for the prediction with d experts setting, the resulting rates are instead completely tight in all parameters, including d. Our analysis gives a streamlined treatment of pairwise probing in OCO by quantifying the benefit of probing via a variance reduction effect, combined with a second-order (variance-based) analysis of Continuous Exponential Weights.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2026.

Builds on

23 of 38 references.

References · 23

  1. 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 798
  2. 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 412
  3. 2020Algorithms with Predictionscited by 152
  4. 2018More Adaptive Algorithms for Adversarial Banditscited by 114
  5. 2014A Second-order Bound with Excess Lossescited by 93
  6. 2013Follow the Leader If You Can, Hedge If You Mustcited by 69
  7. 2015Second-order Quantile Methods for Experts and Combinatorial Gamescited by 47
  8. 2020Online Learning with Imperfect Hintscited by 37
  9. 2017Online Learning with Abstentioncited by 28
  10. 2020Fast Rates for Online Prediction with Abstentioncited by 19
  11. 2017The Price of Information in Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 12
  12. 2013A Stochastic Probing Problem with Applicationscited by 11
11 more
  1. 2016Adaptivity Gaps for Stochastic Probing: Submodular and XOS Functionscited by 11
  2. 2021Logarithmic Regret from Sublinear Hintscited by 11
  3. 2016The Extended Littlestone's Dimension for Learning with Mistakes and Abstentionscited by 10
  4. 2019Pandora's Problem with Nonobligatory Inspectioncited by 9
  5. 2021Online Selective Classification with Limited Feedbackcited by 9
  6. 2023Semi-Bandit Learning for Monotone Stochastic Optimizationcited by 8
  7. 2022Online Learning and Bandits with Queried Hintscited by 6
  8. 2022Pandora's Problem with Nonobligatory Inspection: Optimal Structure and a PTAScited by 6
  9. 2023Submodular Norms with Applications To Online Facility Location and Stochastic Probingcited by 4
  10. 2024Online Learning with Sublinear Best-Action Queriescited by 2
  11. 2026Multi-Armed Bandits With Best-Action Queriescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.