Online Learning and Bandits with Queried Hints
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the classic online learning and stochastic multi-armed bandit (MAB) problems, when at each step, the online policy can probe and find out which of a small number (k) of choices has better reward (or loss) before making its choice. In this model, we derive algorithms whose regret bounds have exponentially better dependence on the time horizon compared to the classic regret bounds. In particular, we show that probing with k=2 suffices to achieve time-independent regret bounds for online linear and convex optimization. The same number of probes improve the regret bound of stochastic MAB with independent arms from O(√nT) to O(n2 log T), where n is the number of arms and T is the horizon length. For stochastic MAB, we also consider a stronger model where a probe reveals the reward values of the probed arms, and show that in this case, k=3 probes suffice to achieve parameter-independent constant regret, O(n2). Such regret bounds cannot be achieved even with full feedback after the play, showcasing the power of limited ``advice'' via probing before making the play. We also present extensions to the setting where the hints can be imperfect, and to the case of stochastic MAB where the rewards of the arms can be correlated.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2022.
Builds on
14 of 67 references.
References · 14
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
- 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 475
- 2018Competitive caching with machine learned advicecited by 194
- 2020Algorithms with Predictionscited by 152
- 2018More Adaptive Algorithms for Adversarial Banditscited by 114
- 2015Cascading Bandits: Learning to Rank in the Cascade Modelcited by 75
- 2020Online Learning with Imperfect Hintscited by 37
- 2022Parsimonious Learning-Augmented Cachingcited by 19
- 2021Logarithmic Regret from Sublinear Hintscited by 11
- 2019Pandora's Problem with Nonobligatory Inspectioncited by 9
- 2017Online Learning via the Differential Privacy Lenscited by 8
- 2021ktexttt-experts -- Online Policies and Fundamental Limitscited by 8
2 more
- 2013Multiarmed Bandits With Limited Expert Advicecited by 7
- 2019Observe Before Play: Multi-armed Bandit with Pre-observationscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
6 papers.
- 2024Online Learning with Sublinear Best-Action Queriescited by 2
- 2026Multi-Armed Bandits With Best-Action Queriescited by 2
- 2024Adaptive Regret for Bandits Made Possible: Two Queries Sufficecited by 1
- 2025Fusing Reward and Dueling Feedback in Stochastic Banditscited by 1
- 2026Online Convex Optimization with Sublinear Noisy Probescited by 0
- 2026Bandits with Probing: Optimal Regret and the Limits of Winner Feedbackcited by 0
- 2026Bandits with Probing: Optimal Regret and the Limits of Winner Feedback14 Sep 2026
- 2026Online Convex Optimization with Sublinear Noisy Probes12 Jun 2026
- 2026Multi-Armed Bandits With Best-Action Queries8 May 2026
- 2025Fusing Reward and Dueling Feedback in Stochastic Bandits22 Apr 2025
- 2024Online Learning with Sublinear Best-Action Queries23 Jul 2024
- 2024Adaptive Regret for Bandits Made Possible: Two Queries Suffice17 Jan 2024