mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fast Rates for Online Prediction with Abstention

arXiv 2001.10623 ↗First posted 28 Jan 2020cs.LG math.ST stat.MLcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the setting of sequential prediction of individual 0, 1-sequences with expert advice, we show that by allowing the learner to abstain from the prediction by paying a cost marginally smaller than frac 12 (say, 0.49), it is possible to achieve expected regret bounds that are independent of the time horizon T. We exactly characterize the dependence on the abstention cost c and the number of experts N by providing matching upper and lower bounds of order fraclog N1-2c, which is to be contrasted with the best possible rate of √Tlog N that is available without the option to abstain. We also discuss various extensions of our model, including a setting where the sequence of abstention costs can change arbitrarily over time, where we show regret bounds interpolating between the slow and the fast rates mentioned above, under some natural assumptions on the sequence of abstention costs.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

19 papers.

Sort: