Persuasion Index: A Theory-Guided Framework for Persuasion Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Identifying persuasive rhetorical cues is critical across domains, from detecting information manipulation and improving AI safety to advancing public health communication. We propose the Persuasion Index (PI), a taxonomy of 15 dimensions grounded in persuasion theories from psychology and communication, and one transparent implementation using 55 sub-features built from lexicons and rule-based detectors. The taxonomy is modular: individual detectors can be replaced while preserving the theoretical structure. We evaluate PI on four public datasets for English argumentative text that vary in domain, style, and outcome measures, and show that PI provides a shared feature space for interpreting rhetorical patterns associated with persuasion-related outcomes. Linear models show that PI features carry meaningful predictive signal while remaining computationally lightweight. Dimension-level analyses reveal recurring associations between PI dimensions and persuasion outcomes across datasets, while also highlighting topic- and stance-specific variation. We release PI as an open-source package and web interface for principled and auditable analysis of human and AI-mediated communication.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 145 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2026.
Builds on
23 of 145 references.
References · 23
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
- 2019Persuasion for Good: Towards a Personalized Persuasive Dialogue System for Social Goodcited by 207
- 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Propaganda in News Articlescited by 130
- 2023Factuality Challenges in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 125
- 2016Winning Arguments: Interaction Dynamics and Persuasion Strategies in Good-faith Online Discussionscited by 106
- 2013A Computational Approach to Politeness with Application to Social Factorscited by 104
- 2020SemEval-2020 Task 11: Detection of Propaganda Techniques in News Articlescited by 79
- 2019A Large-scale Dataset for Argument Quality Ranking: Construction and Analysiscited by 66
- 2017Word Affect Intensitiescited by 51
- 2021SemEval-2021 Task 6: Detection of Persuasion Techniques in Texts and Imagescited by 49
- 2019Automatic Argument Quality Assessment -- New Datasets and Methodscited by 47
11 more
- 2017Argument Strength is in the Eye of the Beholder: Audience Effects in Persuasioncited by 34
- 2019Are You Convinced? Choosing the More Convincing Evidence with a Siamese Networkcited by 29
- 2025NRC VAD Lexicon v2: Norms for Valence, Arousal, and Dominance for over 55k English Termscited by 25
- 2021Weakly-Supervised Hierarchical Models for Predicting Persuasive Strategies in Good-faith Textual Requestscited by 16
- 2024HEART-felt Narratives: Tracing Empathy and Narrative Style in Personal Stories with LLMscited by 16
- 2014How to Ask for a Favor: A Case Study on the Success of Altruistic Requestscited by 15
- 2022The language of opinion change on social media under the lens of communicative actioncited by 12
- 2025Must Read: A Comprehensive Survey of Computational Persuasioncited by 12
- 2025PCoT: Persuasion-Augmented Chain of Thought for Detecting Fake News and Social Media Disinformationcited by 11
- 2017Winning on the Merits: The Joint Effects of Content and Style on Debate Outcomescited by 8
- 2025Towards a Perspectivist Turn in Argument Quality Assessmentcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.