mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

M"OVE: A Holistic LLM Benchmark for the German Public Sector

arXiv 2606.13111 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2026cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present M"OVE (Modelle f"ur die "Offentliche Verwaltung Evaluieren), a holistic benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in the context of the German public sector. While LLMs are increasingly adopted in public administration, model selection remains largely ad hoc, and existing benchmarks offer limited guidance: they are predominantly English-centric, US-centric in content, and focus exclusively on task performance. M"OVE addresses these gaps by evaluating 39 models across two complementary dimensions. Performance criteria cover summarization, question answering, and topic extraction. Governance criteria assess hallucination tendencies, energy consumption, provider transparency, and alignment with German constitutional values and knowledge about positions by German political parties. In total, we utilize ten German-language datasets, including gold- and silverstandard datasets that we constructed to reflect public-administration domains. We employ a multi-metric evaluation strategy combining classical NLP metrics, embedding-based methods, and LLM-as-a-judge approaches. Our results show that no single model dominates across all criteria: top performers differ between tasks, and model size alone is a poor predictor of quality. We further evaluate the benchmark itself, analyzing its statistical precision, LLM judge reliability, the impact of our private datasets on model rankings, the sensitivity of our results to prompt formulation, and the validity of our energy consumption estimates. M"OVE is designed as a living benchmark under active development; results are publicly available at https://moeve.bundesdruckerei.de/.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 136 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.

Builds on

43 of 136 references.

References · 43

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  6. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  7. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  8. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
  9. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  10. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
  11. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
  12. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,292
31 more
  1. 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 876
  2. 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 801
  3. 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 584
  4. 2021Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Trainingcited by 567
  5. 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 465
  6. 2025HealthBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Towards Improved Human Healthcited by 429
  7. 2023Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 418
  8. 2015A Neural Attention Model for Abstractive Sentence Summarizationcited by 396
  9. 2024Retrieval-Augmented Generation for AI-Generated Content: A Surveycited by 354
  10. 2022News Summarization and Evaluation in the Era of GPT-3cited by 327
  11. 2025ARC-AGI-2: A New Challenge for Frontier AI Reasoning Systemscited by 190
  12. 2023The political ideology of conversational AI: Converging evidence on ChatGPT's pro-environmental, left-libertarian orientationcited by 189
  13. 2019On the Measure of Intelligencecited by 144
  14. 2022Holistic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 131
  15. 2016Neural Summarization by Extracting Sentences and Wordscited by 116
  16. 2025HalluLens: LLM Hallucination Benchmarkcited by 92
  17. 2025How Hungry is AI? Benchmarking Energy, Water, and Carbon Footprint of LLM Inferencecited by 76
  18. 2023The Foundation Model Transparency Indexcited by 66
  19. 2022EUR-Lex-Sum: A Multi- and Cross-lingual Dataset for Long-form Summarization in the Legal Domaincited by 40
  20. 2024Towards Multilingual LLM Evaluation for European Languagescited by 30
  21. 2024Multi-Task Contrastive Learning for 8192-Token Bilingual Text Embeddingscited by 21
  22. 2024SemScore: Automated Evaluation of Instruction-Tuned LLMs based on Semantic Textual Similaritycited by 19
  23. 2023Is ChatGPT A Good Keyphrase Generator? A Preliminary Studycited by 17
  24. 2023ChatGPT vs State-of-the-Art Models: A Benchmarking Study in Keyphrase Generation Taskcited by 13
  25. 2025Apertus: Democratizing Open and Compliant LLMs for Global Language Environmentscited by 12
  26. 2025The 2025 Foundation Model Transparency Indexcited by 11
  27. 2025Benchmarking is Broken -- Don't Let AI be its Own Judgecited by 8
  28. 2026The CitizenQuery Benchmark: A Novel Dataset and Evaluation Pipeline for Measuring LLM Performance in Citizen Query Taskscited by 5
  29. 2025Healthy LLMs? Benchmarking LLM Knowledge of UK Government Public Health Informationcited by 4
  30. 2025On the Inevitability of Left-Leaning Political Bias in Aligned Language Modelscited by 4
  31. 2026Agent Benchmarks Fail Public Sector Requirementscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.