Proxy Reward Internalization and Mechanistic Exploitation: A Learned Precursor to Reward Hacking and Its Generalization
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward hacking and misspecification
Abstract (arXiv)
Reward hacking is usually studied after it becomes visible, once a model earns high proxy reward while failing the intended task. We instead study what proxy RL teaches before that failure appears. We introduce Proxy Reward Internalization and Mechanistic Exploitation (PRIME), a learned capability to assess task correctness, predict proxy acceptance, and reason about exploitable proxy--gold gaps. In coding RL environments with exploitable pytest rewards, we measure PRIME through chain-of-thought monitoring, direct probes, and activation-level concept vectors. We find that PRIME emerges in a staged sequence before sustained reward hacking, and that its current direct-probe score forecasts later hack onset and severity even when the visible hack rate is still low. PRIME also adapts when the evaluator changes, retargeting to whichever proxy--gold gap remains rewarded and persisting when gold reward suppresses overt hacking, and ablating its activation directions reduces hacking. Across checkpoints, in-domain PRIME tracks out-of-domain misalignment. Together these results suggest that exploitable proxy RL amplifies a proxy-internalization capability upstream of visible hacking, making PRIME a candidate early-warning signal for broader alignment risk.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward hacking and misspecification, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 17 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.
Builds on
17 of 28 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2026IR3: Contrastive Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Interpretable Detection and Mitigation of Reward Hacking23 Feb
- 2026Adversarial Reward Auditing for Active Detection and Mitigation of Reward Hacking2 Feb
- 2025School of Reward Hacks: Hacking harmless tasks generalizes to misaligned behavior in LLMs24 Aug
- 2025Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscation14 Mar
Other references · 13
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,095
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
- 2025Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Modelscited by 345
- 2024Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Schemingcited by 287
- 2024AI Sandbagging: Language Models can Strategically Underperform on Evaluationscited by 145
- 2024ODIN: Disentangled Reward Mitigates Hacking in RLHFcited by 136
- 2024Language Models Learn to Mislead Humans via RLHFcited by 124
- 2019Reward Tampering Problems and Solutions in Reinforcement Learning: A Causal Influence Diagram Perspectivecited by 108
- 2024InfoRM: Mitigating Reward Hacking in RLHF via Information-Theoretic Reward Modelingcited by 79
- 2025CodeContests+: High-Quality Test Case Generation for Competitive Programmingcited by 46
- 2025Evaluation Faking: Unveiling Observer Effects in Safety Evaluation of Frontier AI Systemscited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Countdown-Code: A Testbed for Studying The Emergence and Generalization of Reward Hacking in RLVR
- 2026From Rebound to Remedy: Understanding and Mitigating Reward Hacking via Representation Engineering
- 2026Monitoring Emergent Reward Hacking During Generation via Internal Activations
- 2026Reward Hacking in the Era of Large Models: Mechanisms, Emergent Misalignment, Challenges
- 2026Do Prompt-Elicited Trajectories Reflect Training-Time Reward Hacking? A Systematic Study on Monitoring Training-Time Reward Hacking in Code Generation
- 2025Natural Emergent Misalignment from Reward Hacking in Production RL
- 2026CATCH: A Controllable Analysis Testbed for Reward Hacking in Coding RL
- 2026A Near-Zero Monitor Readout Is Not Evidence of Behavioral Control