mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Agentic Persona Generation with Critique-Refinement: An Industrial Evaluation

arXiv 2606.09637 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2026cs.SEcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

Personas are widely used in software engineering to support requirements elicitation, design, and validation, but their manual creation is costly, time-consuming, and hard to scale. Recent LLM-based approaches automate persona generation from textual data; however, they typically rely on single-shot generation and subjective evaluations, limiting practical reliability. We present PerGent, an industry-grade method for persona generation built around an iterative critique-refinement loop. Specifically, PerGent uses a generator and a critic LLM agent, coordinated by an orchestrator, to iteratively refine personas using external resources such as interviews, surveys, and job postings through a critique-refinement loop with a user-defined maximum number of rounds. We deploy and evaluate PerGent in an industrial setting at Kinaxis, comparing it with three baselines, including one-shot methods. In an expert in-situ evaluation, PerGent achieved the highest expert approval rate (96.9%), exceeding all baselines. We further compare PerGent-generated personas with best-practice personas manually created by domain experts prior to the adoption of LLMs. Compared to baselines, PerGent reproduces a larger proportion of expert content while also contributing substantial new content beyond the pre-LLM personas. We conclude with lessons learned from deploying and evaluating PerGent at Kinaxis.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 10 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.

Builds on

10 of 27 references.

References · 10

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  2. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
  3. 2024RepairAgent: An Autonomous, LLM-Based Agent for Program Repaircited by 232
  4. 2024Exploring LLM-based Agents for Root Cause Analysiscited by 61
  5. 2024Dated Data: Tracing Knowledge Cutoffs in Large Language Modelscited by 51
  6. 2025Agentic Software Engineering: Foundational Pillars and a Research Roadmapcited by 41
  7. 2023PersonaGen: A Tool for Generating Personas from User Feedbackcited by 6
  8. 2024Who Uses Personas in Requirements Engineering: The Practitioners' Perspectivecited by 3
  9. 2025The Impact of Critique on LLM-Based Model Generation from Natural Language: The Case of Activity Diagramscited by 1
  10. 2026DSL or Code? Evaluating the Quality of LLM-Generated Algebraic Specifications: A Case Study in Optimization at Kinaxiscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024PersonaGym: Evaluating Persona Agents and LLMs
  2. 2026PersonaCite: VoC-Grounded Interviewable Agentic Synthetic AI Personas for Verifiable User and Design Research
  3. 2026Expert Personas Improve LLM Alignment but Damage Accuracy: Bootstrapping Intent-Based Persona Routing with PRISM
  4. 2026A Three-Tier Persona Vector for Controllable User Simulation in Agentic Evaluation
  5. 2025PersonaAgent: Bridging Memory and Action for Personalized LLM Agents
  6. 2025PersonaBOT: Bringing Customer Personas to Life with LLMs and RAG
  7. 2026MatrAIx: Simulating the World with 8.3 Billion Persona Agents
  8. 2025PersonaFeedback: A Large-scale Human-annotated Benchmark For Personalization