mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Emergence of Context Characteristics Sensitivity in Large Language Models

arXiv 2606.09525 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

During instruction fine-tuning (IFT), large language models (LLMs) learn to follow instructions by using the provided context to answer a query. While prior work has studied how context characteristics correlate with context usage by the LLM, this analysis has been limited to inference time, leaving open how these relationships are acquired in the first place. Here, we measure how models' sensitivity to such characteristics shifts across successive IFT stages: supervised fine-tuning (SFT), direct preference optimization (DPO), and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR). Experiments across four models and three datasets show that SFT makes models more likely to use contexts that are easy to understand, such as containing high length, context-query similarity, and fluency. Post-SFT dynamics may either reinforce or resolve these preferences depending on the training dataset. Our findings reveal that context usage is actively reshaped at each IFT stage, and designing a balanced IFT dataset is important in ensuring robust context utilization of instruction-tuned models.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.

Builds on

12 of 28 references.

References · 12

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  4. 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,151
  5. 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 988
  6. 2023Adaptive Chameleon or Stubborn Sloth: Revealing the Behavior of Large Language Models in Knowledge Conflictscited by 333
  7. 2023Fine-Tuning or Retrieval? Comparing Knowledge Injection in LLMscited by 175
  8. 2024Large Language Models are Inconsistent and Biased Evaluatorscited by 146
  9. 2023Few-shot Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning: A Fair Comparison and Evaluationcited by 134
  10. 2023On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Modelscited by 124
  11. 2025NoLiMa: Long-Context Evaluation Beyond Literal Matchingcited by 120
  12. 2025Value Drifts: Tracing Value Alignment During LLM Post-Trainingcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Instruction Tuning with and without Context: Behavioral Shifts and Downstream Impact
  2. 2024Learning or Self-aligning? Rethinking Instruction Fine-tuning
  3. 2023Dynamics of Instruction Fine-Tuning for Chinese Large Language Models
  4. 2023An Emulator for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models using Small Language Models
  5. 2025On the generalization of language models from in-context learning and finetuning: a controlled study
  6. 2025Towards Alignment-Centric Paradigm: A Survey of Instruction Tuning in Large Language Models
  7. 2024Unveiling the Impact of Coding Data Instruction Fine-Tuning on Large Language Models Reasoning
  8. 2025Generalizing From Short to Long: Effective Data Synthesis for Long-Context Instruction Tuning