mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Instruction Tuning with and without Context: Behavioral Shifts and Downstream Impact

arXiv 2506.15480 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction tuning is a widely used approach to improve the instruction-following ability of large language models (LLMs). Instruction-tuning datasets typically include a mixture of context-augmented and context-free examples, yet prior work has largely combined these data types without examining their distinct effects. In this paper, we investigate how training LLMs with or without context affects model behavior and downstream performance. First, in the text domain, we show that LLMs trained with context attend more strongly to the provided knowledge, achieving better grounding. We also observe that context-augmented training shifts how LLMs use knowledge: models store and leverage less on parametric knowledge and instead depend more on the provided context. Second, we observe that using LLM trained with context-augmented data as the backbone for vision-language models reduces hallucination and improves grounding in the visual domain. Finally, we explore practical strategies for real-world deployments where context availability varies. We show that maintaining separate context-augmented and context-free models and routing inputs between them yields more robust overall performance than training a single mixed model, as it better preserves their complementary strengths.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2025.

Builds on

36 of 59 references.

References · 36

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  4. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  5. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  6. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  7. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
  8. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
  9. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
  10. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
  11. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,919
  12. 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,839
24 more
  1. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,470
  2. 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,216
  3. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 903
  4. 2023Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decodingcited by 688
  5. 2020KILT: a Benchmark for Knowledge Intensive Language Taskscited by 573
  6. 2017Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehensioncited by 426
  7. 2023Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decodingcited by 327
  8. 2023AMBER: An LLM-free Multi-dimensional Benchmark for MLLMs Hallucination Evaluationcited by 300
  9. 2023FacTool: Factuality Detection in Generative AI -- A Tool Augmented Framework for Multi-Task and Multi-Domain Scenarioscited by 251
  10. 2023Fine-tuning Language Models for Factualitycited by 221
  11. 2024Multi-Modal Hallucination Control by Visual Information Groundingcited by 208
  12. 2023M3IT: A Large-Scale Dataset towards Multi-Modal Multilingual Instruction Tuningcited by 126
  13. 2024Make Your LLM Fully Utilize the Contextcited by 119
  14. 2024Just read twice: closing the recall gap for recurrent language modelscited by 60
  15. 2023From Language Modeling to Instruction Following: Understanding the Behavior Shift in LLMs after Instruction Tuningcited by 56
  16. 2024CLIP-DPO: Vision-Language Models as a Source of Preference for Fixing Hallucinations in LVLMscited by 49
  17. 2022Masked Motion Encoding for Self-Supervised Video Representation Learningcited by 39
  18. 2024AdaCAD: Adaptively Decoding to Balance Conflicts between Contextual and Parametric Knowledgecited by 37
  19. 2024Toward Robust Hyper-Detailed Image Captioning: A Multiagent Approach and Dual Evaluation Metrics for Factuality and Coveragecited by 20
  20. 2024On the Loss of Context-awareness in General Instruction Fine-tuningcited by 11
  21. 2024Context-Parametric Inversion: Why Instruction Finetuning Can Worsen Context Reliancecited by 10
  22. 2023Roles of Scaling and Instruction Tuning in Language Perception: Model vs. Human Attentioncited by 7
  23. 2025CORG: Generating Answers from Complex, Interrelated Contextscited by 3
  24. 2025Pause-Tuning for Long-Context Comprehension: A Lightweight Approach to LLM Attention Recalibrationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Instruction-Following Evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models
  2. 2025Aligning Instruction Tuning with Pre-training
  3. 2023Vision-Language Instruction Tuning: A Review and Analysis
  4. 2026Emergence of Context Characteristics Sensitivity in Large Language Models
  5. 2025Generalizing From Short to Long: Effective Data Synthesis for Long-Context Instruction Tuning
  6. 2024MLAN: Language-Based Instruction Tuning Preserves and Transfers Knowledge in Multimodal Language Models
  7. 2023Dynamics of Instruction Fine-Tuning for Chinese Large Language Models
  8. 2023Tuna: Instruction Tuning using Feedback from Large Language Models