mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond Similarity: Trustworthy Memory Search for Personal AI Agents

arXiv 2606.06054 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2026cs.AIcited by 12

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent memory systems

Abstract (arXiv)

Personal AI agents increasingly rely on long-term memory to provide persistent personalization across sessions. However, existing memory pipelines are largely driven by semantic similarity: memory data close to the current query is retrieved and injected into the model context. This creates a critical trustworthiness gap, since a semantically related memory may still be contextually inappropriate, leading to threats such as cross-domain leakage, sycophancy, tool-call drift, or memory-induced jailbreaks. In this paper, we study memory search as a trust boundary in personal AI agents. We evaluate representative agentic memory frameworks, including A-Mem, Mem0, and MemOS, together with OpenClaw, a real-world personal-agent environment with persistent state and tool-use capability. Our results show that long-term memory is not merely a utility layer, but a durable control channel that can reshape how agents interpret tasks and execute actions, leaving them highly susceptible to the aforementioned threats. To mitigate these vulnerabilities, we propose MemGate, a lightweight and deployable memory plug-in for trustworthy memory search, with only 9M parameters and a 35.1MB footprint. MemGate is inserted between the vector memory store and the backbone LLM, requiring no LLM modification, memory-database rewriting, or inference-time LLM judge. It applies a query-conditioned neural gate to candidate memory representations, turning raw similarity search into task-conditioned memory admission. Across multiple mainstream memory frameworks, real-world agent settings, and diverse LLM backbones, MemGate reduces memory-induced threats while preserving long-term memory utility.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent memory systems, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 30 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.

Builds on

30 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 10

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Memory-Induced Tool-Drift in LLM Agents24 May
  2. 2026When Personalization Legitimizes Risks: Uncovering Safety Vulnerabilities in Personalized Dialogue Agents25 Jan
  3. 2026OP-Bench: Benchmarking Over-Personalization for Memory-Augmented Personalized Conversational Agents20 Jan
  4. 2025Memory in the Age of AI Agents15 Dec
  5. 2025MIRIX: Multi-Agent Memory System for LLM-Based Agents10 Jul
  6. 2025Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactions7 Jul
  7. 2025Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memory28 Apr
  8. 2025A-MEM: Agentic Memory for LLM Agents17 Feb
  9. 2025Zep: A Temporal Knowledge Graph Architecture for Agent Memory20 Jan
  10. 2024Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agents27 Feb

Other references · 20

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  5. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
  6. 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,453
  7. 2025OpenAI GPT-5 System Cardcited by 989
  8. 2024RAPTOR: Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized Retrievalcited by 532
  9. 2025Search-o1: Agentic Search-Enhanced Large Reasoning Modelscited by 433
  10. 2025AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challengescited by 169
  11. 2025Do LLMs Recognize Your Preferences? Evaluating Personalized Preference Following in LLMscited by 148
  12. 2024Seven Failure Points When Engineering a Retrieval Augmented Generation Systemcited by 139
8 more
  1. 2025MemOS: A Memory OS for AI Systemcited by 138
  2. 2025A Survey on Trustworthy LLM Agents: Threats and Countermeasurescited by 96
  3. 2025A Survey of Personalized Large Language Models: Progress and Future Directionscited by 71
  4. 2026PersistBench: When Should Long-Term Memories Be Forgotten by LLMs?cited by 21
  5. 2026HorizonBench: Long-Horizon Personalization with Evolving Preferencescited by 17
  6. 2026BenchPreS: A Benchmark for Context-Aware Personalized Preference Selectivity of Persistent-Memory LLMscited by 10
  7. 2026Remembering More, Risking More: Longitudinal Safety Risks in Memory-Equipped LLM Agentscited by 7
  8. 2026When Should Models Change Their Minds? Contextual Belief Management in Large Language Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 12.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026SuperLocalMemory: Privacy-Preserving Multi-Agent Memory with Bayesian Trust Defense Against Memory Poisoning
  2. 2026From Recall to Forgetting: Benchmarking Long-Term Memory for Personalized Agents
  3. 2026TRUSTMEM: Learning Trustworthy Memory Consolidation for LLM Agents with Long-Term Memory
  4. 2026MemAudit: Auditing Long-Term Agent Memory via Hidden User-State Recovery
  5. 2026Personalize-then-Store: Benchmarking and Learning Personalized Memory for Long-horizon Agents
  6. 2026AIM: A Privacy-Aware Interoperable Memory Framework for Multi-Agent Multi-User LLM Systems
  7. 2026MemGym: a Long-Horizon Memory Environment for LLM Agents
  8. 2026MemSentry: A Framework for Detecting Persistent Memory Poisoning in Agentic AI