ACE-SQL: Adaptive Co-Optimization via Empirical Credit Assignment for Text-to-SQL
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Text-to-SQL maps natural language questions to executable SQL queries. Modern databases often contain large and complex schemas, making schema linking a critical step for accurate SQL generation. Existing methods either rely on full-schema generation, which leaves schema linking implicit within a large search space, or use a separate retriever trained with static gold-column supervision, whose targets may be suboptimal for the current generator policy. To address this issue, we propose Adaptive Co-optimization via Empirical Credit Assignment for Text-to-SQL (ACE-SQL), a reinforcement learning (RL) framework that jointly optimizes schema retrieval and SQL generation under execution feedback. ACE-SQL constructs an online column-set pool from generator rollouts and derives adaptive on-policy retrieval targets from the column set most frequently associated with execution-correct rollouts. This induces bidirectional adaptation, where the retriever adapts toward column sets that the generator can execute correctly, while the generator adapts to the retriever's evolving schema selections under execution feedback. With approximately 3k synthetic Text-to-SQL question-database pairs for RL training, ACE-SQL achieves 65.3% greedy execution accuracy on BIRD Dev while using 0.93k output tokens per query. The repository is available at https://github.com/xbchen1/ACE-SQL.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.
Builds on
21 of 26 references.
References · 21
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
- 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,120
- 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 667
- 2023DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correctioncited by 465
- 2023Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluationcited by 378
- 2024CodeS: Towards Building Open-source Language Models for Text-to-SQLcited by 183
- 2023C3: Zero-shot Text-to-SQL with ChatGPTcited by 159
- 2023MAC-SQL: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Text-to-SQLcited by 158
- 2024Next-Generation Database Interfaces: A Survey of LLM-based Text-to-SQLcited by 118
- 2017Stabilising Experience Replay for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 114
- 2024MCS-SQL: Leveraging Multiple Prompts and Multiple-Choice Selection For Text-to-SQL Generationcited by 103
9 more
- 2025OmniSQL: Synthesizing High-quality Text-to-SQL Data at Scalecited by 90
- 2025SQL-R1: Training Natural Language to SQL Reasoning Model By Reinforcement Learningcited by 67
- 2024RSL-SQL: Robust Schema Linking in Text-to-SQL Generationcited by 51
- 2022Recent Advances in Text-to-SQL: A Survey of What We Have and What We Expectcited by 47
- 2025Extractive Schema Linking for Text-to-SQLcited by 13
- 2025MTIR-SQL: Multi-turn Tool-Integrated Reasoning Reinforcement Learning for Text-to-SQLcited by 10
- 2025BASE-SQL: A powerful open source Text-To-SQL baseline approachcited by 9
- 2025JOLT-SQL: Joint Loss Tuning of Text-to-SQL with Confusion-aware Noisy Schema Samplingcited by 4
- 2026TRUST-SQL: Tool-Integrated Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning for Text-to-SQL over Unknown Schemascited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.