mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

JOLT-SQL: Joint Loss Tuning of Text-to-SQL with Confusion-aware Noisy Schema Sampling

arXiv 2505.14305 ↗First posted 20 May 2025cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-SQL, which maps natural language to SQL queries, has benefited greatly from recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs). While LLMs offer various paradigms for this task, including prompting and supervised fine-tuning (SFT), SFT approaches still face challenges such as complex multi-stage pipelines and poor robustness to noisy schema information. To address these limitations, we present JOLT-SQL, a streamlined single-stage SFT framework that jointly optimizes schema linking and SQL generation via a unified loss. JOLT-SQL employs discriminative schema linking, enhanced by local bidirectional attention, alongside a confusion-aware noisy schema sampling strategy with selective attention to improve robustness under noisy schema conditions. Experiments on the Spider and BIRD benchmarks demonstrate that JOLT-SQL achieves state-of-the-art execution accuracy among comparable-size open-source models, while significantly improving both training and inference efficiency. Our code is available at https://github.com/Songjw133/JOLT-SQL.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.

Builds on

25 of 35 references.

References · 25

  1. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,139
  2. 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 721
  3. 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 688
  4. 2023DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correctioncited by 477
  5. 20218-bit Optimizers via Block-wise Quantizationcited by 403
  6. 2023Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluationcited by 385
  7. 2024CodeS: Towards Building Open-source Language Models for Text-to-SQLcited by 187
  8. 2024CHESS: Contextual Harnessing for Efficient SQL Synthesiscited by 169
  9. 2023MAC-SQL: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Text-to-SQLcited by 164
  10. 2024Liger Kernel: Efficient Triton Kernels for LLM Trainingcited by 130
  11. 2020Structure-Grounded Pretraining for Text-to-SQLcited by 126
  12. 2024Next-Generation Database Interfaces: A Survey of LLM-based Text-to-SQLcited by 120
13 more
  1. 2021Towards Robustness of Text-to-SQL Models against Synonym Substitutioncited by 110
  2. 2021KaggleDBQA: Realistic Evaluation of Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 106
  3. 2024MCS-SQL: Leveraging Multiple Prompts and Multiple-Choice Selection For Text-to-SQL Generationcited by 105
  4. 2021Exploring Underexplored Limitations of Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Generalizationcited by 92
  5. 2024A Survey on Employing Large Language Models for Text-to-SQL Taskscited by 67
  6. 2024Synthesizing Text-to-SQL Data from Weak and Strong LLMscited by 54
  7. 2022Recent Advances in Text-to-SQL: A Survey of What We Have and What We Expectcited by 47
  8. 2024E-SQL: Direct Schema Linking via Question Enrichment in Text-to-SQLcited by 35
  9. 2023Label Supervised LLaMA Finetuningcited by 20
  10. 2025Extractive Schema Linking for Text-to-SQLcited by 13
  11. 2024SQL-to-Schema Enhances Schema Linking in Text-to-SQLcited by 12
  12. 2025BASE-SQL: A powerful open source Text-To-SQL baseline approachcited by 9
  13. 2025DB-Explore: Automated Database Exploration and Instruction Synthesis for Text-to-SQLcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.