mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

What Objects Enable, Not What They Are: Functional Latent Spaces for Affordance Reasoning

arXiv 2606.05533 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing robot planning systems rely on appearance-based reasoning, where visual observations are encoded into latent spaces organized around object appearances (e.g., recognizing a "cart" based on how it looks). However, planning requires reasoning about task-relevant functionalities of objects (e.g., whether an object is "movable"), which appearance-based latent spaces do not capture. As a result, existing approaches struggle to generalize to novel robot-object interactions. We address this limited generalizability through affordance reasoning, enabling planning based on task-relevant object functionalities instead of appearance alone. We introduce A4D, which maps visual observations into a shared latent space structured around affordances (e.g., "movable"). By projecting visual observations into this functional latent space and measuring their proximity to affordances, A4D infers functionalities relevant to the observed object. Furthermore, we introduce an affordance discovery mechanism that expands the latent space to handle unseen scenarios where existing affordances are insufficient. A4D uses proximity in the functional latent space to quantify uncertainty in affordance inference and selectively triggers affordance discovery. We evaluate A4D across several planning tasks involving diverse and unseen affordances. A4D achieves 94% inference accuracy on existing affordances outperforming state-of-the-art approaches by over 15% points, improves new-affordance inference accuracy from 70% to over 90% with fewer than 10% of the original training data, and enables 100x faster inference. Code, videos, and data available at: https://A4Dance-reasoning.github.io.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.

Builds on

15 of 20 references.

References · 15

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
  3. 2024RoboPoint: A Vision-Language Model for Spatial Affordance Prediction for Roboticscited by 251
  4. 2023Affordances from Human Videos as a Versatile Representation for Roboticscited by 226
  5. 2017AffordanceNet: An End-to-End Deep Learning Approach for Object Affordance Detectioncited by 128
  6. 2022Learning Affordance Grounding from Exocentric Imagescited by 82
  7. 2017Learning to Act Properly: Predicting and Explaining Affordances from Imagescited by 74
  8. 2023LOCATE: Localize and Transfer Object Parts for Weakly Supervised Affordance Groundingcited by 64
  9. 2023Grounding 3D Object Affordance from 2D Interactions in Imagescited by 62
  10. 2024HRP: Human Affordances for Robotic Pre-Trainingcited by 44
  11. 2023Affordance Grounding from Demonstration Video to Target Imagecited by 34
  12. 2024AutoGPT+P: Affordance-based Task Planning with Large Language Modelscited by 19
3 more
  1. 2024KALIE: Fine-Tuning Vision-Language Models for Open-World Manipulation without Robot Datacited by 15
  2. 2022PLATO: Predicting Latent Affordances Through Object-Centric Playcited by 13
  3. 2024Information-driven Affordance Discovery for Efficient Robotic Manipulationcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.