mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AlphaQ: Calibration-Free Bit Allocation for Mixture-of-Experts Quantization

arXiv 2606.04980 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2026cs.LGcited by 7

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → MoE large language models

Abstract (arXiv)

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures scale model capacity through sparse expert activation, but their deployment remains memory-bound because all expert weights must reside in memory. Mixed-precision quantization can substantially reduce this footprint by assigning different bit-widths to different experts. Existing approaches, however, typically rely on calibration data to estimate expert importance and determine bit allocation. For frontier MoE LLMs, the original training data, and hence the true training distribution, is proprietary and inaccessible. As a result, calibration sets are inevitably imperfect surrogates, and this can misestimate expert utilization and lead to suboptimal bit allocation. Motivated by the substantial cross-expert quality variability observed in modern MoE models, and by the success of Heavy-Tailed Self-Regularization (HT-SR) theory at predicting neural network model quality without access to training or testing data, we propose AlphaQ, a calibration-free bit-allocation method for MoE quantization. AlphaQ draws on HT-SR theory and follows a simple principle: experts with more heavy-tailed weight spectra are typically better trained and hence should receive higher bit-widths, while experts with weaker heavy-tailed structure can be quantized more aggressively. AlphaQ operationalizes this principle by measuring expert-wise spectral heavy-tailedness and solving a budget-constrained optimization problem that minimizes total quantization error under a global bit-budget constraint. Across several MoE models, AlphaQ consistently outperforms calibration-based baselines under matched bit budgets. Notably, on Qwen1.5-MoE, AlphaQ achieves near full-precision accuracy with an average expert precision of only 3.5 bits, while delivering more than 4× memory compression. Our code is available at https://github.com/Superone77/AlphaQ.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MoE large language models, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 45 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2026.

Builds on

45 of 67 references.

Closest ancestors · 13

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025EAC-MoE: Expert-Selection Aware Compressor for Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Models3 Aug
  2. 2025MoQAE: Mixed-Precision Quantization for Long-Context LLM Inference via Mixture of Quantization-Aware Experts9 Jun
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Report14 May
  4. 2025MxMoE: Mixed-precision Quantization for MoE with Accuracy and Performance Co-Design9 May
  5. 2025MoEQuant: Enhancing Quantization for Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Models via Expert-Balanced Sampling and Affinity Guidance2 May
  6. 2025DynaMo: Runtime Switchable Quantization for MoE with Cross-Dataset Adaptation27 Mar
  7. 2024Mixture Compressor for Mixture-of-Experts LLMs Gains More8 Oct
  8. 2024OLMoE: Open Mixture-of-Experts Language Models3 Sep
  9. 2024DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model7 May
  10. 2024Mixtral of Experts8 Jan
  11. 2023QMoE: Practical Sub-1-Bit Compression of Trillion-Parameter Models25 Oct
  12. 2020GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Sharding30 Jun
1 more
  1. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer23 Jan

Other references · 32

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  4. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  6. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  7. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  8. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  9. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,073
  10. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
  11. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
  12. 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,919
20 more
  1. 2022SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language Modelscited by 1,386
  2. 2023AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for LLM Compression and Accelerationcited by 1,298
  3. 2021A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inferencecited by 815
  4. 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 708
  5. 2024SpinQuant: LLM quantization with learned rotationscited by 471
  6. 2019HAWQ-V2: Hessian Aware trace-Weighted Quantization of Neural Networkscited by 261
  7. 2018Implicit Self-Regularization in Deep Neural Networks: Evidence from Random Matrix Theory and Implications for Learningcited by 215
  8. 2020Predicting trends in the quality of state-of-the-art neural networks without access to training or testing datacited by 115
  9. 2019Traditional and Heavy-Tailed Self Regularization in Neural Network Modelscited by 105
  10. 2024AI and Memory Wallcited by 92
  11. 2025The Curse of Depth in Large Language Modelscited by 62
  12. 2019Heavy-Tailed Universality Predicts Trends in Test Accuracies for Very Large Pre-Trained Deep Neural Networkscited by 44
  13. 2022Spectral Evolution and Invariance in Linear-width Neural Networkscited by 30
  14. 2017Rethinking generalization requires revisiting old ideas: statistical mechanics approaches and complex learning behaviorcited by 25
  15. 2023Temperature Balancing, Layer-wise Weight Analysis, and Neural Network Trainingcited by 20
  16. 2025AlphaDecay: Module-wise Weight Decay for Heavy-Tailed Balancing in LLMscited by 13
  17. 2024Model Balancing Helps Low-data Training and Fine-tuningcited by 11
  18. 2025Models of Heavy-Tailed Mechanistic Universalitycited by 10
  19. 2025Eigenspectrum Analysis of Neural Networks without Aspect Ratio Biascited by 10
  20. 2026One LR Doesn't Fit All: Heavy-Tail Guided Layerwise Learning Rates for LLMscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Efficient Quantization of Mixture-of-Experts with Theoretical Generalization Guarantees
  2. 2025EAQuant: Enhancing Post-Training Quantization for MoE Models via Expert-Aware Optimization
  3. 2026Colla-Q: Toward Collaborative Experts in MoE Quantization via Minimax Precision Balancing
  4. 2024QuantMoE-Bench: Examining Post-Training Quantization for Mixture-of-Experts
  5. 2026GEMQ: Global Expert-Level Mixed-Precision Quantization for MoE LLMs
  6. 2023Mixture of Quantized Experts (MoQE): Complementary Effect of Low-bit Quantization and Robustness
  7. 2025MC#: Mixture Compressor for Mixture-of-Experts Large Models
  8. 2026Q-Strata: Hierarchical Bit Allocation for Mixed-Precision Quantization of Mixture-of-Experts LLMs