mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can Generalist Agents Automate Data Curation?

arXiv 2606.04261 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2026cs.AI cs.CL cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Curating training data is among the most consequential yet labor-intensive parts of modern AI development: practitioners iteratively propose, implement, evaluate, and revise data policies against noisy benchmark feedback. We ask whether generalist coding agents can automate this data-curation loop. We introduce *Curation-Bench*, an agent-centric benchmark that fixes the model, training recipe, and evaluation suite while giving agents command-line access to inspect data, implement policies, submit them to a fixed training/evaluation pipeline, and revise. In a vision-language instruction-tuning instantiation, out-of-the-box agents reach strong published data-selection baselines within ten iterations. However, trajectory analysis reveals a persistent *execution-research gap*: agents mainly tune local policy variants rather than explore new policy families, even when given strategy guides and paper references. Scaffolds requiring each iteration to cite, instantiate, and adapt a prior method shift agents toward method-guided exploration. The scaffolded agent autonomously composes -- without human design input -- a data-selection policy that outperforms strong published baselines at one-tenth their data budget. Overall, current agents can run the curation loop, but reliable data research requires scaffolded method adaptation, not open-ended prompting alone. Code and benchmark are open-sourced.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.

Builds on

44 of 63 references.

References · 44

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  3. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
  4. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
  5. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  6. 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
  7. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  8. 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,582
  9. 2023MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilitiescited by 1,221
  10. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,002
  11. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agentscited by 956
  12. 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 705
32 more
  1. 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 635
  2. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
  3. 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
  4. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
  5. 2026Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfacescited by 515
  6. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
  7. 2024VLMEvalKit: An Open-Source Toolkit for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Modelscited by 443
  8. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
  9. 2023DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretrainingcited by 385
  10. 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 381
  11. 2025The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Searchcited by 375
  12. 2023MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentationcited by 339
  13. 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 322
  14. 2023SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplicationcited by 295
  15. 2025SmolVLM: Redefining small and efficient multimodal modelscited by 226
  16. 2024Data Mixing Laws: Optimizing Data Mixtures by Predicting Language Modeling Performancecited by 179
  17. 2024Rephrasing the Web: A Recipe for Compute and Data-Efficient Language Modelingcited by 156
  18. 2023D4: Improving LLM Pretraining via Document De-Duplication and Diversificationcited by 146
  19. 2024DSBench: How Far Are Data Science Agents from Becoming Data Science Experts?cited by 119
  20. 2023DoGE: Domain Reweighting with Generalization Estimationcited by 87
  21. 2024Vision-Flan: Scaling Human-Labeled Tasks in Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 73
  22. 2025The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That Fitcited by 48
  23. 2026PostTrainBench: Can LLM Agents Automate LLM Post-Training?cited by 45
  24. 2025EXP-Bench: Can AI Conduct AI Research Experiments?cited by 36
  25. 2024ICONS: Influence Consensus for Vision-Language Data Selectioncited by 28
  26. 2024AutoScale: Scale-Aware Data Mixing for Pre-Training LLMscited by 20
  27. 2024Machine Learning Data Practices through a Data Curation Lens: An Evaluation Frameworkcited by 18
  28. 2023Performance Scaling via Optimal Transport: Enabling Data Selection from Partially Revealed Sourcescited by 16
  29. 2026Olmix: A Framework for Data Mixing Throughout LM Developmentcited by 12
  30. 2026Data-efficient pre-training by scaling synthetic megadocscited by 7
  31. 2025AdaDeDup: Adaptive Hybrid Data Pruning for Efficient Large-Scale Object Detection Trainingcited by 3
  32. 2026TML-Bench: Benchmark for Data Science Agents on Tabular ML Taskscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Exploring Autonomous Agentic Data Engineering for Model Specialization
  2. 2026A case study of evaluating AI agents on a neuroscience data-to-discovery pipeline
  3. 2026CurateEvo: Data-Curation Evolving for Agentic Post-Training
  4. 2025Scaling Generalist Data-Analytic Agents
  5. 2026Autodata: An agentic data scientist to create high quality synthetic data
  6. 2026ANDES: Agent Native Data Evolving Synthesis Tool for Autonomous Instruction Alignment
  7. 2026AutoDataBench: Can Agents Write the Data That Feeds the Self-Improvement Loop?
  8. 2025From Reproduction to Replication: Evaluating Research Agents with Progressive Code Masking