Olmix: A Framework for Data Mixing Throughout LM Development
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data mixing -- determining the ratios of data from different domains -- is a first-order concern for training language models (LMs). While existing mixing methods show promise, they fall short when applied during real-world LM development. We present Olmix, a framework that addresses two such challenges. First, the configuration space for developing a mixing method is not well understood -- design choices across existing methods lack justification or consensus and overlook practical issues like data constraints. We conduct a comprehensive empirical study of this space, identifying which design choices lead to a strong mixing method. Second, in practice, the domain set evolves throughout LM development as datasets are added, removed, partitioned, and revised -- a problem setting largely unaddressed by existing works, which assume fixed domains. We study how to efficiently recompute the mixture after the domain set is updated, leveraging information from past mixtures. We introduce mixture reuse, a mechanism that reuses existing ratios and recomputes ratios only for domains affected by the update. Over a sequence of five domain-set updates mirroring real-world LM development, mixture reuse matches the performance of fully recomputing the mix after each update with 74% less compute and improves over training without mixing by 11.6% on downstream tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 12.
12 papers.
- 2026The Design Space of Tri-Modal Masked Diffusion Modelscited by 6
- 2026Can Generalist Agents Automate Data Curation?cited by 3
- 2026123D: Unifying Multi-Modal Autonomous Driving Data at Scalecited by 2
- 2026Capacity-Aware Mixture Law Enables Efficient LLM Data Optimizationcited by 1
- 2026Laguna M.1/XS.2 Technical Reportcited by 1
- 2026DataComp-VLM: Improved Open Datasets for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026WARP: Weight-Space Analysis for Recovering Training Data Portfolioscited by 1
- 2026Self-Play Pretraining with Zero Datacited by 1
- 2026Domain Mixture Design via Log-Likelihood Differences for Aligning Language Models with a Target Modelcited by 0
- 2026Jagle: Building a Large-Scale Japanese Multimodal Post-Training Dataset for Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Themis: Training Robust Multilingual Code Reward Models for Flexible Multi-Criteria Scoringcited by 0
- 2026Always Learning, Always Mixing: Efficient and Simple Data Mixing All The Timecited by 0
- 2026Self-Play Pretraining with Zero Data24 Sep 2026
- 2026WARP: Weight-Space Analysis for Recovering Training Data Portfolios2 Jul 2026
- 2026DataComp-VLM: Improved Open Datasets for Vision-Language Models26 Jun 2026
- 2026Can Generalist Agents Automate Data Curation?2 Jun 2026
- 2026Laguna M.1/XS.2 Technical Report26 May 2026
- 2026Always Learning, Always Mixing: Efficient and Simple Data Mixing All The Time13 May 2026
- 2026123D: Unifying Multi-Modal Autonomous Driving Data at Scale8 May 2026
- 2026Themis: Training Robust Multilingual Code Reward Models for Flexible Multi-Criteria Scoring1 May 2026
- 2026Jagle: Building a Large-Scale Japanese Multimodal Post-Training Dataset for Vision-Language Models2 Apr 2026
- 2026Domain Mixture Design via Log-Likelihood Differences for Aligning Language Models with a Target Model17 Mar 2026
- 2026Capacity-Aware Mixture Law Enables Efficient LLM Data Optimization9 Mar 2026
- 2026The Design Space of Tri-Modal Masked Diffusion Models25 Feb 2026