mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

RealClawBench: Live OpenClaw Benchmarks from Real Developer-Agent Sessions

arXiv 2606.03889 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2026cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Agent benchmarks should reflect what users actually ask deployed agents to do, yet existing benchmarks often miss key realism properties of real developer-agent sessions. We introduce RealClawBench, a live benchmark framework built from real OpenClaw sessions to capture the distribution, diversity, and real-world difficulty of deployed agent use. Real user requests are challenging to benchmark because they often depend on local execution environments, involve implicit or underspecified intent, and require nontrivial verification. RealClawBench addresses these challenges with two core mechanisms: reconstructed execution environments and deterministic verifiable scorers, which together convert real sessions into reproducible, automatically scored tasks. The resulting release contains 281 executable tasks sampled from a much larger real-session pool while preserving the source distribution, with maximum final-vs-source Jensen-Shannon divergence of 0.0448. Evaluating 14 contemporary models shows that the best system solves only 65.8% of tasks, revealing substantial headroom on realistic developer-agent workloads. By turning real deployed sessions into controlled evaluation instances, RealClawBench provides a practical path toward benchmarks that better measure agent capability in actual use. Code is available at:https://anonymous.4open.science/r/real-claw-bench-582B.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.

Builds on

19 of 45 references.

References · 19

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  4. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  5. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  6. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  7. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
  8. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
  9. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
  10. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
  11. 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 598
  12. 2026Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfacescited by 515
7 more
  1. 2023LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation Datasetcited by 449
  2. 2026Claw-Eval: Towards Trustworthy Evaluation of Autonomous Agentscited by 57
  3. 2025NL2Repo-Bench: Towards Long-Horizon Repository Generation Evaluation of Coding Agentscited by 56
  4. 2026Harness-Bench: Measuring Harness Effects across Models in Realistic Agent Workflowscited by 44
  5. 2026WildClawBench: A Benchmark for Real-World, Long-Horizon Agent Evaluationcited by 29
  6. 2026Benchmarks for Trajectory Safety Evaluation and Diagnosis in OpenClaw and Codex: ATBench-Claw and ATBench-Codexcited by 5
  7. 2026A Primer in Post-Training Reasoning Data: What We Know About How It Workscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.