mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Attribution via Distributional Paths for Information Revelation

arXiv 2606.03885 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Feature attribution methods explain predictions by assigning importance scores to input features. Path-based methods such as Integrated Gradients are especially appealing because they satisfy textitcompleteness: attributions sum to the change in model output between a reference state and the input. Yet most path methods define this trajectory in input space, explaining a model through pointwise perturbed inputs along a chosen path. An input-space path integrates the model's raw response at each point it passes through, with no control over the resolution at which a feature is queried; the early, baseline-adjacent part of the trajectory contributes to the explanation on equal footing with the input itself. Here, we lift path attribution from input space to a space of structured probe distributions around the example of interest, and call our method Reveal-IG. Rather than traversing raw input values, Reveal-IG progressively reveals information about the input and attributes changes in the model's expected output along this distributional path. The result is a path-attribution framework that retains completeness with respect to the expected model response, and naturally accommodates multiscale image probes and feature-wise uncertainty in tabular data. Synthetic diagnostics show that Reveal-IG avoids path artifacts that affect input-space methods, and across ImageNet classification and tabular regression it produces stable, signed attributions -- leading on metrics that use attribution sign while remaining competitive on the rest.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.

Builds on

24 of 39 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  4. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  5. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  6. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  7. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  8. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  9. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
  10. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 547
  11. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 530
  12. 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 310
12 more
  1. 2020Ground Truth Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations with CLEVR-XAIcited by 126
  2. 2020Restricting the Flow: Information Bottlenecks for Attributioncited by 110
  3. 2021Guided Integrated Gradients: An Adaptive Path Method for Removing Noisecited by 102
  4. 2021Large-scale Unsupervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 101
  5. 2022A Rigorous Study of Integrated Gradients Method and Extensions to Internal Neuron Attributionscited by 64
  6. 2020Attribution in Scale and Spacecited by 61
  7. 2023Visual Explanations via Iterated Integrated Attributionscited by 19
  8. 2023Integrated Decision Gradients: Compute Your Attributions Where the Model Makes Its Decisioncited by 9
  9. 2023Information decomposition in complex systems via machine learningcited by 9
  10. 2022Interpretability with full complexity by constraining feature informationcited by 7
  11. 2025Comprehensive Information Bottleneck for Unveiling Universal Attribution to Interpret Vision Transformerscited by 6
  12. 2026Spectral Integrated Gradients for Coarse-to-Fine Feature Attributioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.