Local Guidance, Global Impact: Gaussian-Reshaped Trust Region Unlocks Behavior Transitions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) demonstrates strong performance in stationary settings, we show that its standard optimization paradigm struggles in continual and non-stationary environments. The failure does not stem from insufficient model capacity or overly restrictive clipping. Instead, PPO performs persistent, directionally inefficient local updates, which indicates a lack of geometry-aware guidance for accumulating meaningful behavioral change and ultimately hindering transitions toward new behavior patterns. Although divergence-based regularization introduces partial geometric awareness, its monotonically increasing penalties implicitly discourage large policy deviations, even when such shifts are necessary for effective adaptation. To address this limitation, we propose Gaussian Trust Region Policy Optimization (GTR), which reshapes the trust region using a Gaussian kernel. The resulting constraint is bounded and non-monotonic, providing strong local stability while progressively relaxing under sustained high-advantage updates. To further improve robustness, we introduce a Mixture Gaussian Anchor that adapts to recent policy trajectories, reducing variance induced by stale references. GTR is architecture-agnostic and achieves strong performance across games, simulated robotic control, open-world exploration, and language model post-training. These results demonstrate that geometry-aware trust-region design can be a promising direction for robust reinforcement learning in complex non-stationary environments. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/GTR_demo/README.md.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 61 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.
Builds on
61 of 78 references.
References · 61
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,341
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
38 more
- 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
- 2017PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruningcited by 882
- 2019Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Handcited by 699
- 2016f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence Minimizationcited by 504
- 2019Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement Learningcited by 478
- 2019Learning agile and dynamic motor skills for legged robotscited by 402
- 2023Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datacited by 332
- 2020Towards Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Review and Perspectivescited by 268
- 2023The Dormant Neuron Phenomenon in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 171
- 2023Understanding plasticity in neural networkscited by 170
- 2020What Matters In On-Policy Reinforcement Learning? A Large-Scale Empirical Studycited by 157
- 2018Residual Policy Learningcited by 146
- 2023Bigger, Better, Faster: Human-level Atari with human-level efficiencycited by 145
- 2025SimpleTIR: End-to-End Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Turn Tool-Integrated Reasoningcited by 145
- 2020Phasic Policy Gradientcited by 121
- 2023Loss of Plasticity in Continual Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 118
- 2021Continual World: A Robotic Benchmark For Continual Reinforcement Learningcited by 112
- 2023A Definition of Continual Reinforcement Learningcited by 98
- 2024Disentangling the Causes of Plasticity Loss in Neural Networkscited by 82
- 2024Craftax: A Lightning-Fast Benchmark for Open-Ended Reinforcement Learningcited by 80
- 2024Mixtures of Experts Unlock Parameter Scaling for Deep RLcited by 75
- 2023Deep Reinforcement Learning with Plasticity Injectioncited by 71
- 2024SimBa: Simplicity Bias for Scaling Up Parameters in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 70
- 2020The Value-Improvement Path: Towards Better Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 60
- 2022The State of Sparse Training in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 60
- 2024Normalization and effective learning rates in reinforcement learningcited by 55
- 2024Overestimation, Overfitting, and Plasticity in Actor-Critic: the Bitter Lesson of Reinforcement Learningcited by 50
- 2020Interference and Generalization in Temporal Difference Learningcited by 41
- 2024In value-based deep reinforcement learning, a pruned network is a good networkcited by 38
- 2025Meta-World+: An Improved, Standardized, RL Benchmarkcited by 37
- 2019Trust Region-Guided Proximal Policy Optimizationcited by 36
- 2021Batch size-invariance for policy optimizationcited by 33
- 2024Simple Policy Optimizationcited by 31
- 2024Weight Clipping for Deep Continual and Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
- 2025On a few pitfalls in KL divergence gradient estimation for RLcited by 27
- 2020Lipschitz Lifelong Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
- 2025Mitigating Plasticity Loss in Continual Reinforcement Learning by Reducing Churncited by 22
- 2025Stable Gradients for Stable Learning at Scale in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
50 most cited of 61 All 61 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.