mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

K-BrowseComp: A Web Browsing Agent Benchmark Grounded in Korean Contexts

arXiv 2606.02404 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2026cs.CLcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Frontier model evaluations are shifting from foundational capabilities (e.g., instruction following and reasoning) toward compositional, agentic ones, but Korean agentic benchmarks remain scarce. We introduce K-BrowseComp, a web-browsing agent benchmark grounded in Korean contexts, consisting of 400 problems. The 300-problem K-BrowseComp-Verified subset is manually constructed and validated by native Korean speakers. On this subset, frontier LLMs, including GPT-5.5, DeepSeek-V4-Pro, and GLM-5.1, reach only 30.00--45.67%, a substantial drop from BrowseComp, while Korean LLMs released through Korea's Proprietary AI Foundation Model program obtain only 0.00--10.33%. We further construct a 100-problem synthetic split using hard few-shot exemplars and failure-mode-targeted generation to exploit the asymmetry between solving and creating web browsing problems. On the adversarially filtered synthetic diagnostic split, the strongest model reaches only 26.00%, and we report this split separately as a targeted stress test. We publicly release our data and code.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 15 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.

Builds on

15 of 30 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
  2. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
  3. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,125
  4. 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,075
  5. 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 1,040
  6. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 807
  7. 2025BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agentscited by 647
  8. 2025BrowseComp-ZH: Benchmarking Web Browsing Ability of Large Language Models in Chinesecited by 145
  9. 2024The BiGGen Bench: A Principled Benchmark for Fine-grained Evaluation of Language Models with Language Modelscited by 93
  10. 2024KMMLU: Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding in Koreancited by 91
  11. 2024CLIcK: A Benchmark Dataset of Cultural and Linguistic Intelligence in Koreancited by 66
  12. 2019KorQuAD1.0: Korean QA Dataset for Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 43
3 more
  1. 2022KOBEST: Korean Balanced Evaluation of Significant Taskscited by 37
  2. 2026Soft Contamination Means Benchmarks Test Shallow Generalizationcited by 8
  3. 2025MENLO: From Preferences to Proficiency -- Evaluating and Modeling Native-like Quality Across 47 Languagescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026BrowseComp-V3: A Visual, Vertical, and Verifiable Benchmark for Multimodal Browsing Agents
  2. 2026Projecting BrowseComp-Plus onto ClimbMix: Toward More Realistic Corpora for Agentic Search
  3. 2025Go-Browse: Training Web Agents with Structured Exploration
  4. 2025BrowserArena: Evaluating LLM Agents on Real-World Web Navigation Tasks
  5. 2024Level-Navi Agent: A Framework and benchmark for Chinese Web Search Agents
  6. 2025BrowseComp-Plus: A More Fair and Transparent Evaluation Benchmark of Deep-Research Agent
  7. 2025MM-BrowseComp: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Browsing Agents
  8. 2025WebChoreArena: Evaluating Web Browsing Agents on Realistic Tedious Web Tasks