mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Projecting BrowseComp-Plus onto ClimbMix: Toward More Realistic Corpora for Agentic Search

arXiv 2608.20317 ↗First posted 20 Aug 2026cs.IRcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

The BrowseComp-Plus benchmark disentangled the evaluation of agentic search by replacing opaque web search with a fixed corpus, so that an agent's role can be separated from the retriever's. That corpus, however, holds only about 100K documents and was assembled from the supporting documents of the benchmark's own queries plus mined hard negatives, so the evidence and the distractors were both selected per query. We introduce BrowseComp-PlusCM, which keeps the BrowseComp-Plus questions but relocates their evidence to ClimbMix, a 400B-token, 553M-document mixture of web text released by NVIDIA for pre-training language models and built without reference to any benchmark. Our main contribution is the projection pipeline that makes this possible: it decomposes each question into atomic reasoning hops and grounds every hop in the new corpus, retaining a question only when automatic verification, an independent agent, and human review all confirm that every hop is supported. The pipeline is dataset-agnostic and applies to any benchmark whose questions decompose into verifiable facts. Applied to the 830 BrowseComp-Plus test questions, our pipeline yields 57 fully grounded questions with question-level relevance judgments. Projection shifts the difficulty onto retrieval, as the strongest agent we evaluate loses five points of answer accuracy but sees its evidence recall fall from 84.3% to 21.4% while issuing 63% more search calls. As the first of a series of projections, we release the pipeline, the benchmark, and our analyses at https://github.com/castorini/cmass.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 24 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2026.

Builds on

24 of 31 references.

Closest ancestors · 12

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026A New Role for Relevance: Guiding Corpus Interaction in Agentic Search27 Jul
  2. 2026Towards Retrieving Interaction Spaces for Agentic Search5 Jun
  3. 2026GrepSeek: Training Search Agents for Direct Corpus Interaction28 May
  4. 2026Is Grep All You Need? How Agent Harnesses Reshape Agentic Search14 May
  5. 2026Rethinking Agentic Search with Pi-Serini: Is Lexical Retrieval Sufficient?11 May
  6. 2026Superintelligent Retrieval Agent: The Next Frontier of Agentic Retrieval7 May
  7. 2026Beyond Semantic Similarity: Rethinking Retrieval for Agentic Search via Direct Corpus Interaction3 May
  8. 2026ORBIT: Scalable and Verifiable Data Generation for Search Agents on a Tight Budget1 Apr
  9. 2026Total Recall QA: A Verifiable Evaluation Suite for Deep Research Agents19 Mar
  10. 2026OpenResearcher: A Fully Open Pipeline for Long-Horizon Deep Research Trajectory Synthesis17 Mar
  11. 2026DeepSearchQA: Bridging the Comprehensiveness Gap for Deep Research Agents28 Jan
  12. 2025DeepResearchGym: A Free, Transparent, and Reproducible Evaluation Sandbox for Deep Research25 May

Other references · 12

  1. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,605
  2. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
  3. 2025BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agentscited by 647
  4. 2024Fact, Fetch, and Reason: A Unified Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 162
  5. 2024Nemotron-CC: Transforming Common Crawl into a Refined Long-Horizon Pretraining Datasetcited by 160
  6. 2025Nemotron-CLIMB: CLustering-based Iterative Data Mixture Bootstrapping for Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 66
  7. 2024Ragnar"ok: A Reusable RAG Framework and Baselines for TREC 2024 Retrieval-Augmented Generation Trackcited by 32
  8. 2025MoNaCo: More Natural and Complex Questions for Reasoning Across Dozens of Documentscited by 21
  9. 2025Search-Time Data Contaminationcited by 19
  10. 2026Search, Inspect, Fetch: Exploiting Structure-Aware Boolean Retrieval for Deep-Search Agentscited by 3
  11. 2026NanoKnow: How to Know What Your Language Model Knowscited by 2
  12. 2026Towards Query-Agnostic RAG Evaluation via Query Coverage and Claim Verifiabilitycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026BrowseComp-V3: A Visual, Vertical, and Verifiable Benchmark for Multimodal Browsing Agents
  2. 2026Q2D-Web: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Retrieval in Agentic RAG Systems
  3. 2025BrowseComp-ZH: Benchmarking Web Browsing Ability of Large Language Models in Chinese
  4. 2025From Web Search towards Agentic Deep Research: Incentivizing Search with Reasoning Agents
  5. 2025BrowseComp-Plus: A More Fair and Transparent Evaluation Benchmark of Deep-Research Agent
  6. 2026AgenticRAGTracer: A Hop-Aware Benchmark for Diagnosing Multi-Step Retrieval Reasoning in Agentic RAG
  7. 2026Question's Gambit: The First Move Matters in Agentic Deep Search
  8. 2026FineVerify: Scaling Test-Time Compute with Fine-Grained Self-Verification for Agentic Search