mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Generate in Reconstruction Space, Match in Semantic Space: Transport Geometry for One-Step Generation

arXiv 2606.00514 ↗First posted 30 May 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative modeling and self-supervised representation learning (SSL) optimize structurally different objectives: generative training rewards distributional fidelity, while SSL rewards semantic coherence. Yet recent work repeatedly finds that SSL features improve generative training, though the mechanism of this synergy remains unclear. Here, we study the benefits of SSL in generative modeling in the framework of one-step generation where the role of representation is explicit: frozen SSL features are used to match generated samples to real data. We use the Sinkhorn divergence in that feature space, providing a tractable surrogate for the Wasserstein distance, the population-level discrepancy approximated by Fr'echet-style evaluation metrics (such as FID). We find that this objective becomes highly effective when computed in a semantically structured SSL feature space (a 39× reduction in ImageNet FID). We trace this behavior primarily to matching estimation: semantic SSL features that suppress nuisance reconstruction details induce a more compact geometry, making distribution matching more tractable. As a consequence, the best training SSL features need not match the features used by the evaluation metric. In particular, we show that using Inception as the feature extractor can improve FID while degrading matching stability and sample quality, revealing a form of metric hacking. Using extensive experiments on ImageNet, we identify which SSL feature families lead to best generation performance and show that matching stability is a quantitative criterion for selecting them. Code is available at https://github.com/Genentech/semantic-transport-generation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2026.

Builds on

33 of 46 references.

References · 33

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  3. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
  4. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  5. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  6. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  7. 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 5,931
  8. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  9. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
  10. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  11. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,550
  12. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
21 more
  1. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  2. 2025DINOv3cited by 1,297
  3. 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 765
  4. 2024Representation Alignment for Generation: Training Diffusion Transformers Is Easier Than You Thinkcited by 666
  5. 2025Reconstruction vs. Generation: Taming Optimization Dilemma in Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 376
  6. 2021Deep ViT Features as Dense Visual Descriptorscited by 327
  7. 2017Learning Generative Models with Sinkhorn Divergencescited by 310
  8. 2025Diffusion Transformers with Representation Autoencoderscited by 275
  9. 2015Generative Moment Matching Networkscited by 252
  10. 2025REPA-E: Unlocking VAE for End-to-End Tuning with Latent Diffusion Transformerscited by 212
  11. 2026Generative Modeling via Driftingcited by 98
  12. 2021Entropic estimation of optimal transport mapscited by 87
  13. 2025What matters for Representation Alignment: Global Information or Spatial Structure?cited by 76
  14. 2025Diffuse and Disperse: Image Generation with Representation Regularizationcited by 67
  15. 2025AlignTok: Aligning Visual Foundation Encoders to Tokenizers for Diffusion Modelscited by 35
  16. 2025Joint Embedding vs Reconstruction: Provable Benefits of Latent Space Prediction for Self Supervised Learningcited by 33
  17. 2025REPA Works Until It Doesn't: Early-Stopped, Holistic Alignment Supercharges Diffusion Trainingcited by 33
  18. 2025One Layer Is Enough: Adapting Pretrained Visual Encoders for Image Generationcited by 27
  19. 2025There is No VAE: End-to-End Pixel-Space Generative Modeling via Self-Supervised Pre-trainingcited by 23
  20. 2025VFM-VAE: Vision Foundation Models Can Be Good Tokenizers for Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 16
  21. 2025stable-pretraining-v1: Foundation Model Research Made Simplecited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.