Learning with Imperfect Models: When Multi-step Prediction Mitigates Compounding Error
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Compounding error, where small prediction mistakes accumulate over time, presents a major challenge in learning-based control. For example, this issue often limits the performance of model-based reinforcement learning and imitation learning. One common approach to mitigate compounding error is to train multi-step predictors directly, rather than relying on autoregressive rollout of a single-step model. However, it is not well understood when the benefits of multi-step prediction outweigh the added complexity of learning a more complicated model. In this work, we provide a rigorous analysis of this trade-off in the context of linear dynamical systems. We show that when the model class is well-specified and accurately captures the system dynamics, single-step models achieve lower asymptotic prediction error. On the other hand, when the model class is misspecified due to partial observability, direct multi-step predictors can significantly reduce bias and thus outperform single-step approaches. These theoretical results are supported by numerical experiments, wherein we also (a) empirically evaluate an intermediate strategy which trains a single-step model using a multi-step loss and (b) evaluate performance of single step and multi-step predictors in a closed loop control setting.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2025.
Builds on
15 of 22 references.
References · 15
- 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,730
- 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,873
- 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 753
- 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Modelscited by 748
- 2020MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy Optimizationcited by 630
- 2020MOReL : Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 582
- 2021COMBO: Conservative Offline Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 365
- 2024Reinforcement learningcited by 236
- 2019Combating the Compounding-Error Problem with a Multi-step Modelcited by 52
- 2022Investigating Compounding Prediction Errors in Learned Dynamics Modelscited by 47
- 2023Provable Guarantees for Generative Behavior Cloning: Bridging Low-Level Stability and High-Level Behaviorcited by 33
- 2021Evaluation of deep learning models for multi-step ahead time series predictioncited by 25
3 more
- 2020Learning Accurate Long-term Dynamics for Model-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
- 2022State space models vs. multi-step predictors in predictive control: Are state space models complicating safe data-driven designs?cited by 6
- 2024Stochastic Data-Driven Predictive Control: Chance-Constraint Satisfaction with Identified Multi-step Predictorscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2026WIMLE: Uncertainty-Aware World Models with IMLE for Sample-Efficient Continuous Controlcited by 3
- 2025Logarithmic Regret and Polynomial Scaling in Online Multi-step-ahead Predictioncited by 1
- 2026EXHOLD: Experience-Aware Real-Time Hold Control for Large-Scale Ride-Hailing Matching at DiDicited by 1
- 2026Flow map learning in nonlinear vector autoregressive models: influence of the feature-library structure on the training errorcited by 0
- 2026RTS Smoother-Guided Learning of Physics-Based Neural Differential Modelscited by 0
- 2026RTS Smoother-Guided Learning of Physics-Based Neural Differential Models16 Jul 2026
- 2026EXHOLD: Experience-Aware Real-Time Hold Control for Large-Scale Ride-Hailing Matching at DiDi10 Jul 2026
- 2026Flow map learning in nonlinear vector autoregressive models: influence of the feature-library structure on the training error29 May 2026
- 2026WIMLE: Uncertainty-Aware World Models with IMLE for Sample-Efficient Continuous Control15 Feb 2026
- 2025Logarithmic Regret and Polynomial Scaling in Online Multi-step-ahead Prediction16 Nov 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024A Multi-step Loss Function for Robust Learning of the Dynamics in Model-based Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Any-step Dynamics Model Improves Future Predictions for Online and Offline Reinforcement Learning
- 2025A Model-Based Approach to Imitation Learning through Multi-Step Predictions
- 2023Multi-timestep models for Model-based Reinforcement Learning
- 2018Learning the Reward Function for a Misspecified Model
- 2025The Pitfalls of Imitation Learning when Actions are Continuous
- 2025Action Chunking and Exploratory Data Collection Yield Exponential Improvements in Behavior Cloning for Continuous Control
- 2023A Connection between One-Step Regularization and Critic Regularization in Reinforcement Learning