mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LLM Anonymization Against Agentic Re-Identification

arXiv 2605.30848 ↗First posted 29 May 2026cs.CR cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Agentic LLMs with web search change the threat model for text anonymization: weak contextual cues can become cross-referenceable evidence for re-identification, yet those same details also carry downstream analytic value of the text. Existing defenses either remove explicit identifiers, perturb text for formal privacy, or test rewritten text against non-web inference models, leaving underexplored the operating region between resistance to agentic web-search re-identification and utility retention. We introduce AURA (Anonymization with Utility-Retention Adaptation), an LLM-powered textitmask-reconstruct framework that decouples privacy localization from utility-preserving reconstruction and selects candidates with adversarial privacy and utility-retention checks. We evaluate AURA on real-user interview transcripts using re-identification attacks carried out by web-search agents, along with a utility evaluation based on interviewee-profile facts, codebook facts, and the joint contextual utility grid. Our results show that adaptive-scope AURA yields the lowest agentic re-identification counts under each of three attacker models among the non-DP methods, and that at matched scope and backbone, AURA's mask-reconstruct design retains more contextual utility than the prior LLM anonymizer (+6.4 pp unit-grid recovery) at comparable privacy. Source Code: https://github.com/AaronLi43/AURA

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 29 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

Builds on

29 of 53 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026From Weak Cues to Real Identities: Evaluating Inference-Driven De-Anonymization in LLM Agents19 Mar

Other references · 28

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 629
  3. 2023LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation Datasetcited by 461
  4. 2023ToxicChat: Unveiling Hidden Challenges of Toxicity Detection in Real-World User-AI Conversationcited by 231
  5. 2023Beyond Memorization: Violating Privacy Via Inference with Large Language Modelscited by 175
  6. 2022Synthetic Text Generation with Differential Privacy: A Simple and Practical Recipecited by 108
  7. 2021Hyperparameter Tuning with Renyi Differential Privacycited by 104
  8. 2022The Text Anonymization Benchmark (TAB): A Dedicated Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Text Anonymizationcited by 95
  9. 2016De-identification of Patient Notes with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 88
  10. 2024Clio: Privacy-Preserving Insights into Real-World AI Usecited by 72
  11. 2022The Limits of Word Level Differential Privacycited by 63
  12. 2023Locally Differentially Private Document Generation Using Zero Shot Promptingcited by 63
16 more
  1. 2024PAPILLON: Privacy Preservation from Internet-based and Local Language Model Ensemblescited by 57
  2. 2022A Customized Text Sanitization Mechanism with Differential Privacycited by 52
  3. 2026SWE-chat: Coding Agent Interactions From Real Users in the Wildcited by 43
  4. 2023DP-BART for Privatized Text Rewriting under Local Differential Privacycited by 28
  5. 2025Anthropic Economic Index report: Uneven geographic and enterprise AI adoptioncited by 26
  6. 2024DP-MLM: Differentially Private Text Rewriting Using Masked Language Modelscited by 24
  7. 2018SynTF: Synthetic and Differentially Private Term Frequency Vectors for Privacy-Preserving Text Miningcited by 21
  8. 2023Practical Differentially Private Hyperparameter Tuning with Subsamplingcited by 19
  9. 2025Position: Privacy Is Not Just Memorization!cited by 17
  10. 2024Robust Utility-Preserving Text Anonymization Based on Large Language Modelscited by 10
  11. 2024On the Vulnerability of Text Sanitizationcited by 9
  12. 2025Operationalizing Data Minimization for Privacy-Preserving LLM Promptingcited by 8
  13. 2026Agentic LLMs as Powerful Deanonymizers: Re-identification of Participants in the Anthropic Interviewer Datasetcited by 7
  14. 2023Automatic Anonymization of Swiss Federal Supreme Court Rulingscited by 3
  15. 2025Empirical Privacy Variancecited by 3
  16. 2025Private Hyperparameter Tuning with Ex-Post Guaranteecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AgentDoxx: Agentic Re-identification of Anonymized Text with Web Search
  2. 2025AgentStealth: Reinforcing Large Language Model for Anonymizing User-generated Text
  3. 2026Privacy-Preserving RAG via Multi-Agent Semantic Rewriting: Achieving Confidentiality Without Compromising Contextual Fidelity
  4. 2026Anonymous-by-Construction: An LLM-Driven Framework for Privacy-Preserving Text
  5. 2026Stop Tracking Me! Proactive Defense Against Attribute Inference Attack in LLMs
  6. 2026ADAM: A Systematic Data Extraction Attack on Agent Memory via Adaptive Querying
  7. 2026Spore: Efficient and Training-Free Privacy Extraction Attack on LLMs via Inference-Time Hybrid Probing
  8. 2026BodhiPromptShield: Pre-Inference Prompt Mediation for Surface-Form Privacy Propagation in LLM Agent Pipelines