AgentDoxx: Agentic Re-identification of Anonymized Text with Web Search
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance also fits: Web, search, and research agents
Abstract (arXiv)
As Large Language Models (LLMs) gain tool use capabilities such as web search, they can retrieve and cross-reference public information, creating privacy risks beyond memorization. One manifestation is re-identification: linking an anonymized interview transcript to a named individual. Yet without ground-truth identities, the coverage of such attacks and the protection offered by a defense cannot be reliably measured. We introduce AgentDOXX, an evaluation suite of 822 synthetic interview transcripts grounded in public information about real individuals with known identities. We evaluate fifteen configurations of open-weight and proprietary models, isolating the effect of web search, and analyze their search trajectories to distinguish retrieval-driven from parametric identifications. Ground-truth identities reveal that re-identification risk is distributed across an agent's execution: retrieval and parametric recall both contribute, with open-weight models identifying 15-28% of transcripts without search; identification succeeds in over 88% of cases once the target appears in a retrieved result; entity masking leaves at least one attacker successful on 85.3% of a stratified sample; and privacy instructions suppress naming but not retrieval, with configurations scoring 0% accuracy yet retrieving the subject in up to 62% of transcripts. We further show that observed attack trajectories can provide supervision for localizing identifying spans, offering a path toward attack-informed anonymization.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2026.
Builds on
13 of 22 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2026From Weak Cues to Real Identities: Evaluating Inference-Driven De-Anonymization in LLM Agents19 Mar
Other references · 12
- 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 629
- 2023LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation Datasetcited by 461
- 2023ToxicChat: Unveiling Hidden Challenges of Toxicity Detection in Real-World User-AI Conversationcited by 231
- 2023Beyond Memorization: Violating Privacy Via Inference with Large Language Modelscited by 175
- 2024On the Societal Impact of Open Foundation Modelscited by 65
- 2026SWE-chat: Coding Agent Interactions From Real Users in the Wildcited by 43
- 2024A Synthetic Dataset for Personal Attribute Inferencecited by 36
- 2024IncogniText: Privacy-enhancing Conditional Text Anonymization via LLM-based Private Attribute Randomizationcited by 23
- 2025Position: Privacy Is Not Just Memorization!cited by 17
- 2026Large-scale online deanonymization with LLMscited by 14
- 2024Robust Utility-Preserving Text Anonymization Based on Large Language Modelscited by 10
- 2026Agentic LLMs as Powerful Deanonymizers: Re-identification of Participants in the Anthropic Interviewer Datasetcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026LLM Anonymization Against Agentic Re-Identification
- 2026Privacy-Preserving RAG via Multi-Agent Semantic Rewriting: Achieving Confidentiality Without Compromising Contextual Fidelity
- 2026ADAM: A Systematic Data Extraction Attack on Agent Memory via Adaptive Querying
- 2026Anonymous-by-Construction: An LLM-Driven Framework for Privacy-Preserving Text
- 2025Stronger Re-identification Attacks through Reasoning and Aggregation
- 2026Agents That Know Too Much: A Data-Centric Survey of Privacy in LLM Agents
- 2025PrivacyBench: A Conversational Benchmark for Evaluating Privacy in Personalized AI
- 2025AgentStealth: Reinforcing Large Language Model for Anonymizing User-generated Text