mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Spore: Efficient and Training-Free Privacy Extraction Attack on LLMs via Inference-Time Hybrid Probing

arXiv 2604.23711 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2026cs.CRcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the wide adoption of personal AI assistants such as OpenClaw, privacy leakage in user interaction contexts with large language model (LLM) agents has become a critical issue. Existing privacy attacks against LLMs primarily target training data, while research on inference-time contextual privacy risks in LLM agent memory remains limited. Moreover, prior methods often incur high attack costs, requiring multiple queries or relying on white-box assumptions, which limits their practicality in real-world deployments. To address these issues, we propose a training-free privacy extraction attack targeting LLM agent memory, which we name textscSpore. textscSpore is compatible with both black-box and gray-box settings. In the black-box setting, textscSpore can efficiently extract a small candidate set via a single query to recover the original private information. In the gray-box setting, textscSpore allows the attacker to leverage multi-ranked tokens for more accurate and faster privacy extraction. We provide an information-theoretic analysis of textscSpore and show that it achieves high query efficiency with substantial per query information leakage. Experiments on multiple frontier LLMs show that textscSpore outperforms attack success rate over existing state-of-the-art (SOTA) schemes. It also maintains low attack cost and remains stable across different model parameter settings. We further evaluate the robustness of textscSpore against existing defense mechanisms. Our results show that textscSpore consistently bypasses both detection and strong safety alignment, demonstrating resilient performance in diverse defensive settings and real-world safety threats.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Isolated but Exposed: Persistence-Based Memory Extraction Attack on LLM Agents
  2. 2026ADAM: A Systematic Data Extraction Attack on Agent Memory via Adaptive Querying
  3. 2026Confuse the Model, Control the Flow: Understanding and Mitigating Privacy Leakage from LLM Agents with Information Flow Control
  4. 2026NeuroFilter: Activation-Based Guardrails for Privacy-Conscious LLM Agents
  5. 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theory
  6. 2025Unveiling Privacy Risks in LLM Agent Memory
  7. 2026On the Privacy of LLMs: An Ablation Study
  8. 20251-2-3 Check: Enhancing Contextual Privacy in LLM via Multi-Agent Reasoning