mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Think Fast, Talk Smart: Partitioning Deterministic and Neural Computation for Structured Health Text Generation

arXiv 2605.29652 ↗First posted 28 May 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Clinical and biomedical applications

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used to generate health text from structured records such as wearable time series, biomarkers, vitals, and care-management logs. For recurring health outputs, fluency is not enough: systems must remain faithful to source data, ground explanatory claims in available evidence, follow stated policies, emit machine-readable outputs, and run cheaply enough for repeated use. We ask which responsibilities in structured health generation should be deterministic computation rather than runtime LLM prompting. We introduce Think Fast, Talk Smart, a sleep-health insight pipeline in which deterministic code performs recurring analysis before one bounded LLM writer call. Across 280 user-nights and six models, achieves lower numeric error, lower instruction-compliance error, and lower end-to-end cost than structured zero-shot and few-shot one-call baselines. Layer replacement reveals contract-specific failures: LLM comparison raises numeric error, LLM ranking degrades policy selection, LLM attribution increases unsupported causal language, and an LLM-generated writer interface reintroduces errors even after upstream facts are deterministic. The results support a broader design rule: let code own recurring analysis, and let LLMs express verified facts within bounded interfaces.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Clinical and biomedical applications, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 13 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.

Builds on

13 of 18 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Transforming Wearable Data into Personal Health Insights using Large Language Model Agents10 Jun

Other references · 12

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  4. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  5. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  6. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  7. 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,057
  8. 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 803
  9. 2023Augmented Language Models: a Surveycited by 398
  10. 2023Towards Expert-Level Medical Question Answering with Large Language Modelscited by 382
  11. 2023Adapted Large Language Models Can Outperform Medical Experts in Clinical Text Summarizationcited by 244
  12. 2017Challenges in Data-to-Document Generationcited by 226

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026HEARTS: Benchmarking LLM Reasoning on Health Time Series
  2. 2024A Survey for Large Language Models in Biomedicine
  3. 2025A Scoping Review of Synthetic Data Generation by Language Models in Biomedical Research and Application: Data Utility and Quality Perspectives
  4. 2026The Verbose Context Problem in Medical Records
  5. 2025Large Language Models with Temporal Reasoning for Longitudinal Clinical Summarization and Prediction
  6. 2023MEDITRON-70B: Scaling Medical Pretraining for Large Language Models
  7. 2025SynLLM: A Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models for Medical Tabular Synthetic Data Generation via Prompt Engineering
  8. 2025Leveraging Open-Source Large Language Models for Clinical Information Extraction in Resource-Constrained Settings