Access Sets Matter: Budgeting Expert Reads for Scalable Weight-Space Model Merging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Weight-space model merging is usually formulated as an algebraic operation on checkpoints, yet at LLM scale the limiting resource is often the set of expert weights that must be read. We introduce MergePipe, a budget-aware execution layer that casts LLM merging as an expert access-set problem: given a merge operator and a checkpoint family in a shared weight coordinate system, choose which expert delta blocks to access under an explicit I/O budget. MergePipe indexes parameter blocks, builds deterministic access plans, and executes the induced budgeted merge with replayable manifests. The plan is budget-sound by construction and recovers the full-read merge at full budget; for fixed-coefficient additive operators, the omitted-update error is bounded by the norm of omitted deltas. Across Qwen and Llama merging workloads, MergePipe reduces expert-read I/O by up to an order of magnitude and achieves up to 11× speedups. Representative budget sweeps show O(10-3) parameter deviation from full-read merges and no monotonic degradation on downstream benchmarks.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.
Builds on
20 of 32 references.
References · 20
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
- 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 903
- 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 818
- 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 694
- 2024Model Merging in LLMs, MLLMs, and Beyond: Methods, Theories, Applications and Opportunitiescited by 254
- 2026Not All Disagreement Is Learnable: Token Teachability in On-Policy Distillationcited by 51
- 2024Merge, Ensemble, and Cooperate! A Survey on Collaborative Strategies in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 44
- 2025Activation-Informed Merging of Large Language Modelscited by 30
- 2025Sens-Merging: Sensitivity-Guided Parameter Balancing for Merging Large Language Modelscited by 16
8 more
- 2025InfiGFusion: Graph-on-Logits Distillation via Efficient Gromov-Wasserstein for Model Fusioncited by 12
- 2025Model Merging Scaling Laws in Large Language Modelscited by 12
- 2025InfiFPO: Implicit Model Fusion via Preference Optimization in Large Language Modelscited by 8
- 2025LoRE-Merging: Exploring Low-Rank Estimation For Large Language Model Mergingcited by 7
- 2026Geometry Conflict: Explaining and Controlling Forgetting in LLM Continual Post-Trainingcited by 5
- 2026FeatCal: Feature Calibration for Post-Merging Modelscited by 5
- 2026E-PMQ: Expert-Guided Post-Merge Quantization with Merged-Weight Anchoringcited by 4
- 2026Discovering Physical Directions in Weight Space: Composing Neural PDE Expertscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
- 2026Routing Drift Alone Does Not Diagnose Failure in Merged MoE LLMscited by 0
- 2026SMAT: Simple and Efficient Merge-Aware Trainingcited by 0
- 2026SMAT: Simple and Efficient Merge-Aware Training27 Sep 2026
- 2026Routing Drift Alone Does Not Diagnose Failure in Merged MoE LLMs26 Sep 2026