InfiFPO: Implicit Model Fusion via Preference Optimization in Large Language Models
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Model fusion combines multiple Large Language Models (LLMs) with different strengths into a more powerful, integrated model through lightweight training methods. Existing works on model fusion focus primarily on supervised fine-tuning (SFT), leaving preference alignment (PA) --a critical phase for enhancing LLM performance--largely unexplored. The current few fusion methods on PA phase, like WRPO, simplify the process by utilizing only response outputs from source models while discarding their probability information. To address this limitation, we propose InfiFPO, a preference optimization method for implicit model fusion. InfiFPO replaces the reference model in Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) with a fused source model that synthesizes multi-source probabilities at the sequence level, circumventing complex vocabulary alignment challenges in previous works and meanwhile maintaining the probability information. By introducing probability clipping and max-margin fusion strategies, InfiFPO enables the pivot model to align with human preferences while effectively distilling knowledge from source models. Comprehensive experiments on 11 widely-used benchmarks demonstrate that InfiFPO consistently outperforms existing model fusion and preference optimization methods. When using Phi-4 as the pivot model, InfiFPO improve its average performance from 79.95 to 83.33 on 11 benchmarks, significantly improving its capabilities in mathematics, coding, and reasoning tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 36 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.
Builds on
36 of 45 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Capturing Nuanced Preferences: Preference-Aligned Distillation for Small Language Models20 Feb
- 2024Weighted-Reward Preference Optimization for Implicit Model Fusion4 Dec
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
Other references · 33
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
21 more
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
- 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,475
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
- 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 939
- 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 903
- 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 818
- 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 694
- 2019Patient Knowledge Distillation for BERT Model Compressioncited by 508
- 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMscited by 327
- 2023Task Arithmetic in the Tangent Space: Improved Editing of Pre-Trained Modelscited by 221
- 2024Evolutionary Optimization of Model Merging Recipescited by 208
- 2023TheoremQA: A Theorem-driven Question Answering datasetcited by 192
- 2024Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuningcited by 138
- 2025KodCode: A Diverse, Challenging, and Verifiable Synthetic Dataset for Codingcited by 119
- 2024Knowledge Fusion of Large Language Modelscited by 115
- 2019Quick and (not so) Dirty: Unsupervised Selection of Justification Sentences for Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 59
- 2024Unconstrained Model Merging for Enhanced LLM Reasoningcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 7.
8 papers.
- 2025Model Merging Scaling Laws in Large Language Modelscited by 12
- 2026Geometry Conflict: Explaining and Controlling Forgetting in LLM Continual Post-Trainingcited by 5
- 2026FeatCal: Feature Calibration for Post-Merging Modelscited by 5
- 2026E-PMQ: Expert-Guided Post-Merge Quantization with Merged-Weight Anchoringcited by 4
- 2026Discovering Physical Directions in Weight Space: Composing Neural PDE Expertscited by 3
- 2026Access Sets Matter: Budgeting Expert Reads for Scalable Weight-Space Model Mergingcited by 2
- 2026Routing Drift Alone Does Not Diagnose Failure in Merged MoE LLMscited by 0
- 2026SMAT: Simple and Efficient Merge-Aware Trainingcited by 0
- 2026SMAT: Simple and Efficient Merge-Aware Training27 Sep 2026
- 2026Routing Drift Alone Does Not Diagnose Failure in Merged MoE LLMs26 Sep 2026
- 2026Access Sets Matter: Budgeting Expert Reads for Scalable Weight-Space Model Merging28 May 2026
- 2026E-PMQ: Expert-Guided Post-Merge Quantization with Merged-Weight Anchoring16 May 2026
- 2026Discovering Physical Directions in Weight Space: Composing Neural PDE Experts14 May 2026
- 2026FeatCal: Feature Calibration for Post-Merging Models13 May 2026
- 2026Geometry Conflict: Explaining and Controlling Forgetting in LLM Continual Post-Training10 May 2026
- 2025Model Merging Scaling Laws in Large Language Models29 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025InfoPO: On Mutual Information Maximization for Large Language Model Alignment
- 2024Towards a Unified View of Preference Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey
- 2024Unified Preference Optimization: Language Model Alignment Beyond the Preference Frontier
- 2024Multi-Reference Preference Optimization for Large Language Models
- 2024Spread Preference Annotation: Direct Preference Judgment for Efficient LLM Alignment
- 2025DiffPO: Diffusion-styled Preference Optimization for Efficient Inference-Time Alignment of Large Language Models
- 2024Self-Augmented Preference Optimization: Off-Policy Paradigms for Language Model Alignment
- 2024Optimizing LLMs with Direct Preferences: A Data Efficiency Perspective