PrismFlow: Residual Dynamics for Flow Matching in Time-Series Generation
On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science
Abstract (arXiv)
Generating high-quality time-series data is challenging because real-world signals often exhibit multimodal patterns and multiscale dynamics, including oscillations and high-frequency variations. Flow Matching (FM) offers an efficient alternative to diffusion models, but practical implementations typically rely on a single finite-capacity global vector-field estimator. In such heterogeneous temporal distributions, distinct regimes may pass through nearby flow states while requiring incompatible conditional velocities. A monolithic estimator trained with the standard ℓ2 velocity-matching objective may therefore learn an overly smoothed approximation of the local transport field. This estimator-level smoothing can attenuate branch-specific dynamics, leading to spectral distortion and poor mode coverage. To address this, we propose PrismFlow, a new FM method with Koopman-inspired dynamical experts. Each expert learns residual corrections in a latent space where local nonlinear temporal evolution can be approximated by linear transitions. We further propose a confidence-aware Winner-Take-All (WTA) objective that updates only the expert best aligned with each sample while masking gradients to the others, encouraging mode-specific specialization. During sampling, the selected expert adds a residual dynamical correction to the global transport field, preserving FM stability while recovering fine-grained and high-frequency temporal structures. Across various benchmarks, PrismFlow effectively mitigates the spectral contraction in standard FM and achieves state-of-the-art performance, with a 15.6% gain in Context-FID and a 38.6% improvement in Discriminative Score, while remaining robust in low-data settings and effective for forecasting and imputation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 28 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2026.
Builds on
28 of 47 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Diff2Flow: Training Flow Matching Models via Diffusion Model Alignment2 Jun
- 2025T2S: High-resolution Time Series Generation with Text-to-Series Diffusion Models5 May
- 2025On the Guidance of Flow Matching4 Feb
- 2024Flow Matching with Gaussian Process Priors for Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting3 Oct
- 2024A Survey on Diffusion Models for Time Series and Spatio-Temporal Data29 Apr
- 2024Diffusion-TS: Interpretable Diffusion for General Time Series Generation4 Mar
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct
Other references · 21
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,717
- 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,094
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
- 2020DiffWave: A Versatile Diffusion Model for Audio Synthesiscited by 1,339
- 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 897
- 2017Real-valued (Medical) Time Series Generation with Recurrent Conditional GANscited by 329
- 2025Sundial: A Family of Highly Capable Time Series Foundation Modelscited by 168
- 2017Generalization and Equilibrium in Generative Adversarial Nets (GANs)cited by 165
- 2021TimeVAE: A Variational Auto-Encoder for Multivariate Time Series Generationcited by 139
- 2016C-RNN-GAN: Continuous recurrent neural networks with adversarial trainingcited by 132
- 2020COT-GAN: Generating Sequential Data via Causal Optimal Transportcited by 70
9 more
- 2025Goku: Flow Based Video Generative Foundation Modelscited by 67
- 2021PSA-GAN: Progressive Self Attention GANs for Synthetic Time Seriescited by 58
- 2023On the Constrained Time-Series Generation Problemcited by 52
- 2025Time Series Generation Under Data Scarcity: A Unified Generative Modeling Approachcited by 14
- 2024Diverse Intra- and Inter-Domain Activity Style Fusion for Cross-Person Generalization in Activity Recognitioncited by 6
- 2025Winner-takes-all for Multivariate Probabilistic Time Series Forecastingcited by 4
- 2020Sample weighting as an explanation for mode collapse in generative adversarial networkscited by 2
- 2025Sequence Modeling with Spectral Mean Flowscited by 2
- 2018Improved Training of Generative Adversarial Networks Using Representative Featurescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Is Flow Matching Just Trajectory Replay for Sequential Data?
- 2025TimeFlow: Towards Stochastic-Aware and Efficient Time Series Generation via Flow Matching Modeling
- 2025Towards Stable and Structured Time Series Generation with Perturbation-Aware Flow Matching
- 2025Longitudinal Flow Matching for Trajectory Modeling
- 2025Operator Flow Matching for Timeseries Forecasting
- 2026Multimarginal flow matching with optimal transport potentials
- 2025Fine-Tuning Flow Matching via Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Reconstructions
- 2026Training-Free Refinement of Flow Matching with Divergence-based Sampling