mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Generalized Tikhonov Layer for Interpretable-by-design Graph Neural Networks

arXiv 2605.28578 ↗First posted 27 May 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose the Tikhonov layer, a graph neural network layer that is interpretable by design: once trained, its learned parameters directly reveal which node features and which aspects of the graph topology were leveraged for prediction. In practice, the layer's propagation matrix takes the closed-form R = (p(L)+Q)-1 Q, where L is the normalized graph Laplacian, Q = diag(q1,...,qn) a learnable diagonal matrix of positive node-importance scores, and p(·) a learnable polynomial. For any input feature x, the layer output Rx is the exact minimizer of a generalized graph Tikhonov problem that trades off node-level data fidelity against a topology-driven regularization penalty. The learned pair qi,p constitutes a built-in explanation: large qi indicates that node i's own features drive the prediction, while small qi signals reliance on the local graph topology; the shape of p reveals whether homophily, heterophily, or a band-pass response is exploited. Expressivity is preserved by routing complexity through a dedicated, arbitrarily deep Q-network that produces the importance scores, while the Tikhonov layer itself remains transparent. We prove that distinct node-importance matrices yield distinct propagation operators, structurally coupling the explanation to the computation. Additionally, the Tikhonov layer provides, in a single layer, a global receptive field, mitigating both oversmoothing and oversquashing. Experiments on standard graph classification benchmarks confirm that the model matches (and sometimes outperforms) opaque baselines while producing interpretable and faithful explanations.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.

Builds on

22 of 32 references.

References · 22

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,089
  4. 2013Spectral Networks and Locally Connected Networks on Graphscited by 1,102
  5. 2018Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,102
  6. 2018Predict then Propagate: Graph Neural Networks meet Personalized PageRankcited by 993
  7. 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 737
  8. 2020On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and its Practical Implicationscited by 631
  9. 2020Parameterized Explainer for Graph Neural Networkcited by 426
  10. 2019Diffusion Improves Graph Learningcited by 414
  11. 2019Graph Neural Networks with convolutional ARMA filterscited by 185
  12. 2019Understanding Attention and Generalization in Graph Neural Networkscited by 169
10 more
  1. 2018Contextual Stochastic Block Modelscited by 134
  2. 2021ProtGNN: Towards Self-Explaining Graph Neural Networkscited by 96
  3. 2021Towards Self-Explainable Graph Neural Networkcited by 75
  4. 2013Community detection thresholds and the weak Ramanujan propertycited by 47
  5. 2022Explaining the Explainers in Graph Neural Networks: a Comparative Studycited by 35
  6. 2017Design of graph filters and filterbankscited by 22
  7. 2024Reconsidering Faithfulness in Regular, Self-Explainable and Domain Invariant GNNscited by 16
  8. 2025Can You Hear Me Now? A Benchmark for Long-Range Graph Propagationcited by 10
  9. 2026GNN Explanations that do not Explain and How to find Themcited by 5
  10. 2021Bermuda Triangles: GNNs Fail to Detect Simple Topological Structurescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.