mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LaneRoPE: Positional Encoding for Collaborative Parallel Reasoning and Generation

arXiv 2605.27570 ↗First posted 26 May 2026cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Parallel LLM test-time scaling techniques (e.g., best-of-N) require drawing N>1 sequences conditioned on the same input prompt. These methods boost accuracy while exploiting the computational efficiency of batching N generations. However, each sequence in the batch is traditionally generated independently and hence does not reuse intermediate generations, computations, or observations from other sequences. In this paper, we propose LaneRoPE to enable coordination and collaboration among N>1 sequences at generation time. LaneRoPE involves two key ideas: (a) an inter-sequence attention mask to make sampling of sequences dependent on one another; and (b) a RoPE extension that injects positional information that captures relative positions between tokens, both within and outside a particular sequence. We evaluate our approach on mathematical reasoning tasks and find promising results: LaneRoPE enables collaboration among sequences, yielding additional accuracy gains under limited generated sequence length. Importantly, since LaneRoPE enables coordination with minimal changes to the underlying LLM architecture and introduces a negligible overhead at inference time, it is appealing to rapidly incorporate parallel reasoning into existing LLM inference pipelines.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 19 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2026.

Builds on

19 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025ThreadWeaver: Adaptive Threading for Efficient Parallel Reasoning in Language Models24 Nov
  2. 2025Parallel-R1: Towards Parallel Thinking via Reinforcement Learning9 Sep
  3. 2025ParaThinker: Native Parallel Thinking as a New Paradigm to Scale LLM Test-time Compute30 Aug
  4. 2025Learning to Reason Across Parallel Samples for LLM Reasoning10 Jun
  5. 2025Group Think: Multiple Concurrent Reasoning Agents Collaborating at Token Level Granularity16 May
  6. 2025Learning Adaptive Parallel Reasoning with Language Models21 Apr
  7. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters6 Aug
  8. 2024Stream of Search (SoS): Learning to Search in Language1 Apr

Other references · 11

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  3. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  4. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  5. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,703
  6. 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 991
  7. 2024KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimizationcited by 264
  8. 2025Hogwild! Inference: Parallel LLM Generation via Concurrent Attentioncited by 32
  9. 2025Multiverse: Your Language Models Secretly Decide How to Parallelize and Merge Generationcited by 30
  10. 2025ASPD: Unlocking Adaptive Serial-Parallel Decoding by Exploring Intrinsic Parallelism in LLMscited by 11
  11. 2025Generalized Parallel Scaling with Interdependent Generationscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026OpenDeepThink: Parallel Reasoning via Bradley-Terry Aggregation
  2. 2026ThinkBooster: A Unified Framework for Seamless Test-Time Scaling of LLM Reasoning
  3. 2025Prompting Test-Time Scaling Is A Strong LLM Reasoning Data Augmentation
  4. 2024Improving LLM Reasoning through Scaling Inference Computation with Collaborative Verification
  5. 2026Parason: Revealing Subtask and Trial Parallelism in LLM Reasoning
  6. 2025The Sequential Edge: Inverse-Entropy Voting Beats Parallel Self-Consistency at Matched Compute
  7. 2026Revisiting the Effectiveness of LLM Pruning for Test-Time Scaling
  8. 2026V1: Unifying Generation and Self-Verification for Parallel Reasoners