mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RLVR Datasets and Where to Find Them: Tracing Data Lineage for Better Training Data

arXiv 2605.26971 ↗First posted 26 May 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The proliferation of Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) datasets has exacerbated provenance collapse due to unclear lineage among existing datasets. To bridge this fragmented RLVR data landscape, we propose Atomic-source Tracing via Lineage-Aware Search (ATLAS), a systematic framework for tracing RLVR datasets back to their atomic sources, attributing over 99.7% of 1.45M instances to 20 atomic sources. Our analysis reveals that most RLVR datasets are variants of a small set of shared upstream sources, with few introducing genuinely new data, and many facing data contamination risks. These findings naturally motivate us to curate a new RLVR dataset, DAPO++, and to benchmark existing datasets from a lineage-aware perspective. To this end, we propose Source-level Counterfactual Attribution (SCA) as a guiding principle to curate a decontaminated training dataset with concentrated learning signals. Essentially, SCA measures a sample's marginal utility by comparing per-atomic-source RL checkpoints against a shared base model. Building upon these attribution signals, we further design a composite dataset quality score Q that strongly correlates with downstream RLVR performance. Experiments on Qwen3 series models verify that DAPO++ consistently improves performance on held-out benchmarks, while Q reliably predicts downstream RLVR training effectiveness. Our code and data is available at https://github.com/Celine-hxy/ATLAS.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2026.

Builds on

26 of 37 references.

References · 26

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  4. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  5. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  6. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
  7. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  8. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,392
  9. 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,136
  10. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
  11. 2025Humanity's Last Examcited by 491
  12. 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Modelcited by 461
14 more
  1. 2025Learning to Reason under Off-Policy Guidancecited by 281
  2. 2025DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing Reasoningcited by 280
  3. 2024Imitate, Explore, and Self-Improve: A Reproduction Report on Slow-thinking Reasoning Systemscited by 164
  4. 2025Seed1.5-Thinking: Advancing Superb Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 161
  5. 2025Big-Math: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Math Dataset for Reinforcement Learning in Language Modelscited by 109
  6. 2025An Empirical Study on Eliciting and Improving R1-like Reasoning Modelscited by 78
  7. 2024MathOdyssey: Benchmarking Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills in Large Language Models Using Odyssey Math Datacited by 52
  8. 2025Klear-Reasoner: Advancing Reasoning Capability via Gradient-Preserving Clipping Policy Optimizationcited by 39
  9. 2025AMO-Bench: Large Language Models Still Struggle in High School Math Competitionscited by 38
  10. 2024HARP: A challenging human-annotated math reasoning benchmarkcited by 27
  11. 2024Does Data Contamination Detection Work (Well) for LLMs? A Survey and Evaluation on Detection Assumptionscited by 26
  12. 2026Benchmark^2: Systematic Evaluation of LLM Benchmarkscited by 13
  13. 2026Efficient RLVR Training via Weighted Mutual Information Data Selectioncited by 6
  14. 2026Tracing the Data Trail: A Survey of Data Provenance, Transparency and Traceability in LLMscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Detecting RLVR Training Data via Structural Convergence of Reasoning
  2. 2025Position: The Hidden Costs and Measurement Gaps of Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
  3. 2026DataFlex-RL: An Evaluation Platform for RLVR Data Policies
  4. 2025DRIVE: Data Curation Best Practices for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward in Competitive Code Generation
  5. 2026Noisy Data is Destructive to Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
  6. 2025Auditing Data Membership in Reinforcement Learning With Verifiable Rewards
  7. 2026Single-Rollout Hidden-State Dynamics for Training-Free RLVR Data Selection
  8. 2025RL-Selector: Reinforcement Learning-Guided Data Selection via Redundancy Assessment