Uncertainty-Aware Budget Allocation for Adaptive Test-Time Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Sampling multiple responses improves language model reasoning, but uniform compute allocation is inefficient because easy questions are over-sampled while hard questions remain under-explored. We propose Uncertainty-Aware Budget Allocation (UAB), a concave integer optimization framework that reallocates a fixed sampling budget using uncertainty estimated from the initial samples themselves. In Phase-1, every question receives a small fixed number of generations. Their answer disagreement, measured by vote entropy, provides a difficulty signal while these generations contribute to the final vote. In Phase-2, the remaining budget is allocated by a marginal-greedy algorithm that optimally solves a concave coverage-maximization surrogate, concentrating samples on questions whose initial answers disagree. Across five open-weight models (1.5B--27B parameters) and five reasoning benchmarks of varying difficulty, UAB improves average accuracy by +2.3% over uniform allocation, and achieves gains of up to +5.5% on individual benchmarks, with the largest gains in low-resource settings. Moreover, UAB meets the target budget exactly and requires no auxiliary model or additional LLM calls. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/manhitv/UAB.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 18 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2026.
Builds on
18 of 33 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Breaking the Pre-Sampling Barrier: Activation-Informed Difficulty-Aware Self-Consistency10 Feb
- 2026Reliability-Aware Adaptive Self-Consistency for Efficient Sampling in LLM Reasoning6 Jan
- 2025Optimal Self-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning with Large Language Models15 Nov
- 2025Seer Self-Consistency: Advance Budget Estimation for Adaptive Test-Time Scaling12 Nov
- 2025MUR: Momentum Uncertainty guided Reasoning for Large Language Models20 Jul
- 2025SelfBudgeter: Adaptive Token Allocation for Efficient LLM Reasoning16 May
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters6 Aug
- 2024Inference Scaling Laws: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal Inference for Problem-Solving with Language Models1 Aug
Other references · 10
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 946
- 2025Debate or Vote: Which Yields Better Decisions in Multi-Agent Large Language Models?cited by 74
- 2026Hear Both Sides: Efficient Multi-Agent Debate via Diversity-Aware Message Retentioncited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Plan and Budget: Effective and Efficient Test-Time Scaling on Reasoning Large Language Models
- 2025Less is More: Improving LLM Reasoning with Minimal Test-Time Intervention
- 2026Interpretable Adaptive Sampling for LLM Test-Time Scaling
- 2026Thinking Hard, Not Smart: Reasoning Models Fail to Ration Test-Time Compute Across Questions
- 2026Adaptive Test-Time Compute Allocation via Learned Heuristics over Categorical Structure
- 2025CarBoN: Calibrated Best-of-N Sampling Improves Test-time Reasoning
- 2025Certainty-Guided Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Dynamic Thinking Budget Approach
- 2026Adaptive Test-Time Compute Allocation for Reasoning LLMs via Constrained Policy Optimization