Reliability-Aware Adaptive Self-Consistency for Efficient Sampling in LLM Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Self-Consistency improves reasoning reliability through multi-sample aggregation, but incurs substantial inference cost. Adaptive self-consistency methods mitigate this issue by adjusting the sampling budget; however, they rely on count-based stopping rules that treat all responses equally, often leading to unnecessary sampling. We propose Reliability-Aware Adaptive Self-Consistency (ReASC), which addresses this limitation by reframing adaptive sampling from response counting to evidence sufficiency, leveraging response-level confidence for principled information aggregation. ReASC operates in two stages: a single-sample decision stage that resolves instances confidently answerable from a single response, and a reliability-aware accumulation stage that aggregates responses by jointly leveraging their frequency and confidence. Across five models and four datasets, ReASC consistently achieves the best accuracy-cost trade-off compared to existing baselines, yielding improved inference efficiency across model scales from 3B to 27B parameters. As a concrete example, ReASC reduces inference cost by up to 70% relative to self-consistency while preserving accuracy on GSM8K using Gemma-3-4B-it.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 15 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2026.
Builds on
15 of 25 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Deep Think with Confidence21 Aug
- 2025Scalable Best-of-N Selection for Large Language Models via Self-Certainty25 Feb
- 2025Confidence Improves Self-Consistency in LLMs10 Feb
- 2024Soft Self-Consistency Improves Language Model Agents20 Feb
- 2024Escape Sky-high Cost: Early-stopping Self-Consistency for Multi-step Reasoning19 Jan
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know11 Jul
Other references · 9
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
- 2024Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark For Large Language Modelscited by 284
- 2023Enhancing Uncertainty-Based Hallucination Detection with Stronger Focuscited by 99
- 2025xVerify: Efficient Answer Verifier for Reasoning Model Evaluationscited by 55
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 11.
11 papers.
- 2026Hallucinations Live in Variancecited by 4
- 2026MARS: Margin-Adversarial Risk-controlled Stopping for Parallel LLM Test-time Scalingcited by 3
- 2026Learning When to Sample: Confidence-Aware Selective Sampling for Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 2
- 2026Dual-Dimensional Consistency: Balancing Budget and Quality in Adaptive Inference-Time Scalingcited by 1
- 2026Boosting Self-Consistency with Rankingcited by 1
- 2026Uncertainty-Aware Budget Allocation for Adaptive Test-Time Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Sample Count Is Not Enough: Candidate-Generation Strategy Shapes the Energy and Performance of LLM Test-Time Scalingcited by 0
- 2026Strategic Self-Consistencycited by 0
- 2026Beyond Symmetric Agents: Cognitive Diversity and Multi-Agent Debate in Small Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Certainty Is Not Just Correctness: Rethinking Token-Level Certainty in LLM Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Compare to Correct: Pairwise-Guided Logit Adjustment for LLM Test-Time Scalingcited by 0
- 2026Compare to Correct: Pairwise-Guided Logit Adjustment for LLM Test-Time Scaling13 Oct 2026
- 2026Certainty Is Not Just Correctness: Rethinking Token-Level Certainty in LLM Reasoning26 Sep 2026
- 2026Beyond Symmetric Agents: Cognitive Diversity and Multi-Agent Debate in Small Language Models26 Sep 2026
- 2026Strategic Self-Consistency24 Sep 2026
- 2026Sample Count Is Not Enough: Candidate-Generation Strategy Shapes the Energy and Performance of LLM Test-Time Scaling16 Sep 2026
- 2026MARS: Margin-Adversarial Risk-controlled Stopping for Parallel LLM Test-time Scaling11 Jun 2026
- 2026Boosting Self-Consistency with Ranking3 Jun 2026
- 2026Uncertainty-Aware Budget Allocation for Adaptive Test-Time Reasoning26 May 2026
- 2026Dual-Dimensional Consistency: Balancing Budget and Quality in Adaptive Inference-Time Scaling14 May 2026
- 2026Learning When to Sample: Confidence-Aware Selective Sampling for Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoning9 Mar 2026
- 2026Hallucinations Live in Variance11 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025A Theoretical Study on Bridging Internal Probability and Self-Consistency for LLM Reasoning
- 2024Reasoning Aware Self-Consistency: Leveraging Reasoning Paths for Efficient LLM Sampling
- 2025Optimal Self-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning with Large Language Models
- 2025Self-Consistency Is Losing Its Edge: Diminishing Returns and Rising Costs in Modern LLMs
- 2024Make Every Penny Count: Difficulty-Adaptive Self-Consistency for Cost-Efficient Reasoning
- 2026Refining Over Resampling: Test-Time Self-Correction for LLM Reasoning
- 2023Let's Sample Step by Step: Adaptive-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning and Coding with LLMs
- 2025Certified Self-Consistency: Statistical Guarantees and Test-Time Training for Reliable Reasoning in LLMs