Seer Self-Consistency: Advance Budget Estimation for Adaptive Test-Time Scaling
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Test-time scaling improves the inference performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) but also incurs substantial computational costs. Although recent studies have reduced token consumption through dynamic self-consistency, they remain constrained by the high latency of sequential requests. In this paper, we propose SeerSC, a dynamic self-consistency framework that simultaneously improves token efficiency and latency by integrating System 1 and System 2 reasoning. Specifically, we utilize the rapid System 1 to compute the answer entropy for given queries. This score is then used to evaluate the potential of samples for scaling, enabling dynamic self-consistency under System 2. Benefiting from the advance and accurate estimation provided by System 1, the proposed method can reduce token usage while simultaneously achieving a significant decrease in latency through parallel generation. It outperforms existing methods, achieving up to a 47% reduction in token consumption and a 43% reduction in inference latency without significant performance loss.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 25 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2025.
Builds on
25 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 14
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Slim-SC: Thought Pruning for Efficient Scaling with Self-Consistency17 Sep
- 2025Latency and Token-Aware Test-Time Compute11 Sep
- 2025Deep Think with Confidence21 Aug
- 2025Adaptive Termination for Multi-round Parallel Reasoning: An Universal Semantic Entropy-Guided Framework9 Jul
- 2025Faster and Better LLMs via Latency-Aware Test-Time Scaling26 May
- 2025Efficient Reasoning Models: A Survey15 Apr
- 2025A Survey on Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models: What, How, Where, and How Well?31 Mar
- 2025Efficient Inference for Large Reasoning Models: A Survey29 Mar
- 2025Sampling-Efficient Test-Time Scaling: Self-Estimating the Best-of-N Sampling in Early Decoding3 Mar
- 2025TokenSkip: Controllable Chain-of-Thought Compression in LLMs17 Feb
- 2025Bridging Internal Probability and Self-Consistency for Effective and Efficient LLM Reasoning1 Feb
- 2024Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMs30 Dec
2 more
Other references · 11
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 946
- 2025Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 381
- 2025From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 319
- 2025Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergycited by 204
- 2024Are More LLM Calls All You Need? Towards Scaling Laws of Compound Inference Systemscited by 24
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Hidden States as Early Signals: Step-level Trace Evaluation and Pruning for Efficient Test-Time Scalingcited by 10
- 2026HyPER: Bridging Exploration and Exploitation for Scalable LLM Reasoning with Hypothesis Path Expansion and Reductioncited by 0
- 2026Uncertainty-Aware Budget Allocation for Adaptive Test-Time Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Uncertainty-Aware Budget Allocation for Adaptive Test-Time Reasoning26 May 2026
- 2026HyPER: Bridging Exploration and Exploitation for Scalable LLM Reasoning with Hypothesis Path Expansion and Reduction6 Feb 2026
- 2026Hidden States as Early Signals: Step-level Trace Evaluation and Pruning for Efficient Test-Time Scaling14 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Optimal Self-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning with Large Language Models
- 2025A Theoretical Study on Bridging Internal Probability and Self-Consistency for LLM Reasoning
- 2025Efficient Test-Time Scaling via Self-Calibration
- 2025The Art of Scaling Test-Time Compute for Large Language Models
- 2025Are We Scaling the Right Thing? A System Perspective on Test-Time Scaling
- 2025Revisiting the Test-Time Scaling of o1-like Models: Do they Truly Possess Test-Time Scaling Capabilities?
- 2025The Energy Cost of Reasoning: Analyzing Energy Usage in LLMs with Test-time Compute
- 2025The Sequential Edge: Inverse-Entropy Voting Beats Parallel Self-Consistency at Matched Compute