mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LECTOR: Joint Optimization of Scientific Reasoning Graphs and Introduction Generation

arXiv 2605.25964 ↗First posted 25 May 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

AI Scientists have shown promising progress across multiple stages of the research pipeline, among which automatic scientific paper writing remains a formidable challenge. The Introduction writing is especially challenging, which demands not only linguistic fluency, but logical soundness and verifiable faithfulness. Most AI-assisted methods treat the task as text generation instead of reasoning and structuring, leading to severe drawbacks, e.g., hallucinating citations. To address this, we first formulate the Content-Conditional Introduction Generation (CCIG) task, which requires grounding the Introduction in the paper's core evidence. We then propose LECTOR, a novel Logic-Expression Co-Reinforcement Learning framework that can strictly follow the scientist's logic, add high-quality citations and keep structured expressions. LECTOR first constructs a logic-reasoning graph from the paper's main body to serve as a verifiable logical blueprint. Subsequently, it employs a Logic-Expression Co-Rewarding mechanism to jointly optimize for both the graph's structural fidelity and the final narrative's quality. We conduct a dataset from Nature Communications papers to assess our method. Extensive experiments show consistent improvements in both logic fidelity and Introduction generation quality metrics, e.g., Graph Quality (+26.7%), Citation Quality (+8.6%), and Paper Consistency (+3.3%). Code and data are available at https://github.com/Xiao-Youth/LECTOR.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.

Builds on

23 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025ARCHE: A Novel Task to Evaluate LLMs on Latent Reasoning Chain Extraction16 Nov
  2. 2025AI-Researcher: Autonomous Scientific Innovation24 May

Other references · 21

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  3. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  4. 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
  5. 2023LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understandingcited by 1,378
  6. 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,271
  7. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,002
  8. 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 793
  9. 2021A Dataset of Information-Seeking Questions and Answers Anchored in Research Paperscited by 475
  10. 2025The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Searchcited by 375
  11. 2024LongBench v2: Towards Deeper Understanding and Reasoning on Realistic Long-context Multitaskscited by 367
  12. 2024MinerU: An Open-Source Solution for Precise Document Content Extractioncited by 255
9 more
  1. 2024CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated Reviewcited by 142
  2. 2024AutoSurvey: Large Language Models Can Automatically Write Surveyscited by 116
  3. 2025DeepScientist: Advancing Frontier-Pushing Scientific Findings Progressivelycited by 56
  4. 2025SurveyForge: On the Outline Heuristics, Memory-Driven Generation, and Multi-dimensional Evaluation for Automated Survey Writingcited by 47
  5. 2024SciDQA: A Deep Reading Comprehension Dataset over Scientific Paperscited by 15
  6. 2023Contrastive Hierarchical Discourse Graph for Scientific Document Summarizationcited by 9
  7. 2025Towards AI-Assisted Research Writing: Benchmarking LLMs for AI/ML Introduction Generationcited by 5
  8. 2025Dynamic Knowledge Exchange and Dual-diversity Review: Concisely Unleashing the Potential of a Multi-Agent Research Teamcited by 4
  9. 2025NLP-AKG: Few-Shot Construction of NLP Academic Knowledge Graph Based on LLMcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Debate as Reward: A Multi-Agent Reward System for Scientific Ideation via RL Post-Training
  2. 2025Sparks of Science: Hypothesis Generation Using Structured Paper Data
  3. 2025SciReasoner: Laying the Scientific Reasoning Ground Across Disciplines
  4. 2026COGTRL: Training LLMs for Scientific Discovery Assistance using Cognitive Traces via Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2026PaperMind: Benchmarking Agentic Reasoning and Critique over Scientific Papers in Multimodal LLMs
  6. 2026PaperClaw: Harnessing Agents for Autonomous Research and Human-in-the-Loop Refinement
  7. 2025SciNets: Graph-Constrained Multi-Hop Reasoning for Scientific Literature Synthesis
  8. 2026PaperGuide: Making Small Language-Model Paper-Reading Agents More Efficient