mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SciDQA: A Deep Reading Comprehension Dataset over Scientific Papers

arXiv 2411.05338 ↗First posted 8 Nov 2024cs.CLcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Scientific literature is typically dense, requiring significant background knowledge and deep comprehension for effective engagement. We introduce SciDQA, a new dataset for reading comprehension that challenges LLMs for a deep understanding of scientific articles, consisting of 2,937 QA pairs. Unlike other scientific QA datasets, SciDQA sources questions from peer reviews by domain experts and answers by paper authors, ensuring a thorough examination of the literature. We enhance the dataset's quality through a process that carefully filters out lower quality questions, decontextualizes the content, tracks the source document across different versions, and incorporates a bibliography for multi-document question-answering. Questions in SciDQA necessitate reasoning across figures, tables, equations, appendices, and supplementary materials, and require multi-document reasoning. We evaluate several open-source and proprietary LLMs across various configurations to explore their capabilities in generating relevant and factual responses. Our comprehensive evaluation, based on metrics for surface-level similarity and LLM judgements, highlights notable performance discrepancies. SciDQA represents a rigorously curated, naturally derived scientific QA dataset, designed to facilitate research on complex scientific text understanding.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2024.

Builds on

21 of 46 references.

References · 21

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  5. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  6. 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,288
  7. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 903
  8. 2022Galactica: A Large Language Model for Sciencecited by 744
  9. 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 719
  10. 2023The Falcon Series of Open Language Modelscited by 535
  11. 2021A Dataset of Information-Seeking Questions and Answers Anchored in Research Paperscited by 486
  12. 2024Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Modelscited by 446
9 more
  1. 2023Nougat: Neural Optical Understanding for Academic Documentscited by 245
  2. 2022Revisiting the Gold Standard: Grounding Summarization Evaluation with Robust Human Evaluationcited by 142
  3. 2018A Dataset of Peer Reviews (PeerRead): Collection, Insights and NLP Applicationscited by 136
  4. 2021Learning Compact Metrics for MTcited by 93
  5. 2020BIOMRC: A Dataset for Biomedical Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 35
  6. 2023ARIES: A Corpus of Scientific Paper Edits Made in Response to Peer Reviewscited by 34
  7. 2024ReIFE: Re-evaluating Instruction-Following Evaluationcited by 22
  8. 2023Relatedly: Scaffolding Literature Reviews with Existing Related Work Sectionscited by 21
  9. 2023The Semantic Reader Project: Augmenting Scholarly Documents through AI-Powered Interactive Reading Interfacescited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 10; 2026: 5.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: