Beyond the Frontier: Stochastic Backtracking for Efficient Test-Time Scaling
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Test-time scaling improves language model reasoning by spending additional compute to explore multiple solution trajectories. The key challenge is to maximize accuracy while minimizing the total number of generated tokens during reasoning. Recent PRM-guided methods score intermediate prefixes to steer this search, but most are frontier-only: they keep only the current active prefixes and irreversibly prune or resample away the rest using noisy PRM scores. This can cause premature commitment, diversity collapse, and the loss of prefixes that still admit correct continuations. We introduce stochastic backtracking over a persistent pool of historical prefixes, allowing test-time compute to revisit previously generated states instead of only expanding the current frontier. To make this efficient, we propose two complementary mechanisms. Subpool Selection strengthens greedy PRM-guided search by applying Top-N selection within random subpools, giving historical prefixes a chance to bypass over-scored frontier candidates. Power Backtrack Sequential Monte Carlo extends SMC-style resampling to the persistent pool using powered PRM scores and mixture-corrected weights. Across mathematical reasoning benchmarks and model scales, our methods consistently achieve higher accuracy per token count, and the same level of accuracy using only a fraction of the token count in comparison to strong PRM-guided baselines, demonstrating that persistent-pool stochastic backtracking provides a simple and effective way to improve the accuracy-token trade-off in test-time scaling.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 13 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2026.
Builds on
13 of 61 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025On the Limits of Test-Time Compute: Sequential Reward Filtering for Better Inference4 Dec
- 2025Mitigating Premature Exploitation in Particle-based Monte Carlo for Inference-Time Scaling7 Oct
- 2025Learning to Refine: Self-Refinement of Parallel Reasoning in LLMs27 Aug
- 2024When is the consistent prediction likely to be a correct prediction?8 Jul
Other references · 9
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,244
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 991
- 2025Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAscited by 521
- 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervisioncited by 441
- 2025CoLD: Counterfactually-Guided Length Debiasing for Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 5
- 2026Ensembling Language Models with Sequential Monte Carlocited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Revisiting Test-Time Scaling: A Survey and a Diversity-Aware Method for Efficient Reasoning
- 2026Towards Better Exploration in Sequential Test-Time Scaling
- 2025The Art of Scaling Test-Time Compute for Large Language Models
- 2025First Finish Search: Efficient Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models
- 2026Predicting and improving test-time scaling laws via reward tail-guided search
- 2026Caterpillar of Thoughts: The Optimal Test-Time Algorithm for Large Language Models
- 2026Divergent-Convergent Reasoning: Scaling Test-Time Compute through Structured Solution Synthesis
- 2025To Backtrack or Not to Backtrack: When Sequential Search Limits Model Reasoning