mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Toward Enactive Artificial Intelligence

arXiv 2605.24238 ↗First posted 22 May 2026cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we advocate for incorporating enactive approaches to perception and cognition into artificial intelligence (AI). Enactive approaches view perception as an active, skillful engagement with the world, where agents perceive by acting and by understanding how their actions shape their experience. This contrasts with classical views that treat perception as a passive internal process in which the brain receives sensory input, processes it, and issues commands for action. Enactive views emphasize the dynamic, embodied, and interactive character of perception, grounded in the lived experience of agents embedded in their environments. We identify and develop four key enactive concepts that we find most relevant to AI: experience, action perception inseparability, autonomy, and embodiment. Much of mainstream AI, from classical rule based systems to large language models, has largely neglected these insights, treating cognition as internal processing detached from embodied interaction and intrinsic normativity. Reinforcement learning (RL), however, exhibits structural resonance with enactive principles through its emphasis on action, agent environment interaction, feedback driven adaptation, and agent centered evaluation. However, this resonance should not be taken as theoretical equivalence, as RL approximates some enactive insights, but key elements remain absent or weakly developed. Building on this analysis, we suggest a broader incorporation of enactive ideas into both mainstream AI and RL.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2026.

Builds on

11 of 62 references.

References · 11

  1. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  2. 2018World Modelscited by 1,513
  3. 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,136
  4. 2020Towards Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Review and Perspectivescited by 274
  5. 2014Robots that can adapt like animalscited by 204
  6. 2023A Definition of Continual Reinforcement Learningcited by 101
  7. 2021Temporal Abstraction in Reinforcement Learning with the Successor Representationcited by 54
  8. 2020What can I do here? A Theory of Affordances in Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
  9. 2022Reward-Respecting Subtasks for Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
  10. 2020Affordance as general value function: A computational modelcited by 5
  11. 2013Quantifying Morphological Computationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024The Phenomenology of Machine: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Sentience of the OpenAI-o1 Model Integrating Functionalism, Consciousness Theories, Active Inference, and AI Architectures
  2. 2026Seeing Isn't Believing: Mitigating Belief Inertia via Active Intervention in Embodied Agents
  3. 2020Action and Perception as Divergence Minimization
  4. 2026ACE-Brain-0.5: A Unified Embodied Foundational Model for Physical Agentic AI
  5. 2016Discovering Latent States for Model Learning: Applying Sensorimotor Contingencies Theory and Predictive Processing to Model Context
  6. 2026ESI-Bench: Towards Embodied Spatial Intelligence that Closes the Perception-Action Loop
  7. 2025ENACT: Evaluating Embodied Cognition with World Modeling of Egocentric Interaction
  8. 2025A Survey: Learning Embodied Intelligence from Physical Simulators and World Models